Archive for November, 2007

FOUR NEW SAINTS AND THE QUEST FOR ORTHODOX UNITY IN NORTH AMERICA, Part Three

archbishop-st-john-maksimovich-the-wonderworker-3.jpg

An Orthodox Life of St John of San Francisco

(+ 19 June/2 July 1966)

St John of San Francisco (1896-1966) is also known as St John of Shanghai, St John of Western Europe and St John the Wonderworker. Such were the many places where he was bishop, such were his many qualities. He was considered a saint in his own lifetime and icons began to appear in Orthodox churches not long after his repose. A zealous bishop and theologian of the Orthodox Church, St John is still well remembered with great spiritual love in Australia, the Philippines, Western Europe, in North and South America and, today, increasingly in Russia, where churches have already been dedicated to him.

The Synod of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia canonized Archbishop John on the 28th anniversary of his repose, 2 July 1994. In preparation for this glorification, the tomb containing his relics was opened. When the sepulchre cover was removed, the metal coffin was found to be in a poor state of preservation due to moisture. Rust had eaten through the coffin and the cover was rusted tightly shut. Inside, the Gospel Book over the remains had virtually disintegrated, the cross in the Archbishop’s hand was corroded, an icon had deteriorated and the episcopal vestments were mildewed and falling apart. The relics of Archbishop John, however, were incorrupt. His skin was white and soft and his body was found to be very light due to dehydration but quite intact. Those who venerated the relics discovered that they exuded a sweet fragrance. Exposure of a body to an amount of moisture that had deteriorated metal and other objects would have caused rapid decomposition. There was no basis to argue that Archbishop John’s body had undergone mummification.

This man of God was born on 4 June 1896 in the province of Kharkov in what was then southern Russia. At baptism he was given the name Michael. As a child he was serious for his years and he later wrote: ‘From the first days when I began to become aware of myself, I wished to serve righteousness and truth. My parents kindled in me a striving to stand unwaveringly for the truth, and my soul was captivated by the example of those who had given their lives for it’. Following the desire of his parents, he entered law school in Kharkov. He was naturally gifted student, but spent more time reading Lives of Saints then attending academic lectures. ‘While studying the worldly sciences’, he wrote, ‘I went all the more deeply into the study of the science of sciences, into the study of the spiritual life’.

After the Bolshevik seizure of power in Russia, he was evacuated together with his family to Belgrade in Serbia, where he entered the faculty of theology at the University. In 1926, a year after his graduation, he was tonsured a monk and given the name John, after his own distant relative who is a canonized saint, St John of Tobolsk (Archbishop John was to be buried with an icon of his saintly relative). In November of that same year, he was ordained priest. Soon he became a teacher at the Seminary of St John the Theologian in Bitol. More than once the bishop of that diocese would say: ‘If you wish to see a living saint, go to Father John’.

It was his own students who first became aware of Fr John’s great feat of asceticism. At night they noticed that he would stay up, making the rounds of the dormitories and praying over the sleeping students. ‘Finally, it was discovered that he scarcely slept at all, and never in a bed, allowing himself only an hour or two each night of uncomfortable rest in a sitting position, or bent over on the floor, praying before icons’. This ascetic feat he continued for the rest of his life, bringing his body ‘into subjection’, according to the holy Apostle Paul: ‘But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached to others, I myself should become disqualified’ (I Corinthians 9, 27).

At the age of 38 he was consecrated bishop by the great theologian Metropolitan Antony (Khrapovitsky), in the company of several bishops who are now saints. He was sent to the diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia in Shanghai. There he took an active interest in the religious education of the young, encouraged and participated in various charitable organizations, founded an orphanage, and gathered sick and starving children off the streets. He always wore clothing of the cheapest Chinese fabric and often went barefoot, sometimes giving his sandals away to some poor man. He served the divine liturgy daily, as he did for the rest of his life. In China it became evident that Bishop John was not only a righteous man, but a true ascetic, a man of prayer and a wonderworker.

Once in Shanghai Bishop John was asked to the bed of a dying child, whose case had been called hopeless by the doctors. Entering the apartment, he went straight to the room in which the sick boy lay, although no one managed yet to show him where this was. Without examining the child, he immediately fell down in front of the icon in the corner, which was very characteristic of him, and prayed for a long time. Then, assuring the relatives that the child would recover, he quickly left. And in fact the child became better towards morning and he soon recovered, so that a doctor was no longer needed. He loved to visit the sick and if the condition of a patient would become critical, he would go to him at any hour of the day or night to pray at his bedside. There were cases when patients would cry out to Bishop John in the middle of the night from their hospital beds and he would go to see them without even being called by phone.

When the coming of the Communists, the Russians in China were forced to flee again, mostly through the Philippines. At one time 5,000 of the refugees were living in an International Refugee Organization camp on the island of Tubabao, located in the path of typhoons. When the fear of typhoons was mentioned by one Russian to the Filippinos, they replied that there was no reason to worry, because, ‘your holy man blesses your camp from four directions every night’. They referred to Bishop John, for no typhoon struck the island while he was there.

In trying to resettle his flock in Christ our Lord, Bishop John went to Washington D.C. There he had to meet a committee in the Senate to appeal for the Russian refugees. However, he went only after he had celebrated the divine liturgy. Once the liturgy was over, he went to the Senate on behalf of the Russian refugees, but was by then late. By the time the small of stature holy man had entered the Senate, they had already moved on to another item on the agenda. Nevertheless, everyone in the Senate stood up out of respect, for they saw that a man of God had entered the room and wanted to hear his appeal on behalf of the Russian refugees in the Philippines. After Bishop John had given his report to the Senate Committee, the refugees were able to go to America and live in San Francisco. All the Russian refugees were able to go to America - including his orphanage, which he later established in San Francisco and which became known as St Tikhon’s Orphanage.

In 1951 Bishop John was sent to Western Europe and here he was later made Archbishop. Here too his reputation for holiness spread - and not only among the Orthodox. In one of the Roman Catholic churches of Paris, a priest strove to inspire his young people with these words: ‘You demand proofs, you say that now there are neither miracles nor saints. Why should I give you theoretical proofs, when today there walks in the streets of Paris a saint - St Jean Nu Pieds - St John the Barefoot. In the twelve years that St John spent looking after various nationalities in Western Europe and also in North Africa, he gave hope to all and an example of Orthodox truth, faithfulness and piety amid the errors and apostasies of the post-war period in Western Europe. It was here especially that he became renowned as a missionary, receiving Western European Orthodox back into their ancestral faith after some nine hundred years. He also restored veneration for the ancient local saints of the many lands of Western Europe, laying the foundations of the later struggles of other Orthodox, who followed in his footsteps.

At the end of 1962 Archbishop John was transferred to America, in fact to San Francisco and many of his former flock from China. As Archbishop of San Francisco, he was called on to sort out a bitter internal division among the Russian Orthodox. Many of these had become secular and politically-minded Americans and had forsaken the purity of their ancestral faith of Holy Rus. In particular they were divided with regard to the building of the new Cathedral. Archbishop John was to suffer much, including being put on trial in a secular court, but he bore slander and indignity from false brethren with patience and humility. Indeed, this was to be his Gethsemane and Golgotha before his Resurrection. For on 19 June (2 July according to the secular calendar) 1966, during an archpastoral visit to Seattle with the Wonder-working Kursk Root Icon of the Mother of God, Archbishop John peacefully gave up his soul to the Lord, whom he had served so faithfully during his earthly life.

His body was flown to San Francisco, where for six days it lay in the Cathedral he had built in an open coffin. In New York Metropolitan Philaret wanted to attend the funeral service in San Francisco, but due to the fact that he had heart problems, it was suggested that he take the train to San Francisco. This of course delayed the funeral for the newly-reposed Archbishop John. However this did not matter, because when Metropolitan Philaret arrived at the Joy of All Who Sorrow Russian Orthodox Cathedral for the funeral, Archbishop John’s body still showed no signs of decay. It was said that he looked pure and that a sense of spiritual beauty was felt when any approached his coffin during the funeral service.

From the beginning of the first service it was apparent that this was to be no ordinary farewell to the newly departed Archbishop. There was a sense of being present at the unfolding of a mystery: the mystery of holiness that still exists to this day. ‘Those present were devoutly convinced that they had come to bury a saint’. Since the reposed of Archbishop John many of the faithful came to call him Blessed John, and for these many years his tomb (St John was buried under the Church of the Cathedral of the Joy of All Who Sorrow in San Francisco) was a place of pilgrimage for thousands and thousands of Orthodox Christians throughout the world, before his remarkable canonization by the Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia on 2 July 1994. Ever since then, St John’s reputation as a saint and powerful intercessor have grown and he has become a saint venerated worldwide.

Holy Hierarch Father John, Pray to God for us!

The Legends of Russian Rock Music, Part One

Aquarium

Aquarium played a special part in the history of Soviet rock music and still stands out in the panorama of modern bands. It was the activity of this group in the early 1980s that served as a catalyst for consolidation of the leading creative powers of the uncoordinated amateurish rock movement. It helped to enrich the rock language with many achievements of world music culture and attracted the attention of many millions of Russian and foreign fans to Russian language rock.

Aquarium was started in 1972 by Boris Grebenshchikov, then a student at Leningrad State University, and by dramatist Anatoly Gunitsky. At first, it reflected its members’ taste for American rock-n-roll, Oriental philosophy, bard songs, and the literature of absurd. The first public performances of the band in 1974 more struck the audience for their esoteric subjects rather than for their professionalism. Aquarium gained a foothold as the most active participant of Leningrad amateurish rock stage. In 1974, Aquarium won an award at the Tallinn rock festival for “the most versatile programme” and a bit later it went on tour in Moscow. The opening of a Leningrad rock club that coincided with the release of its first studio record, Sinii Albom (Blue Album), enabled the band to give regular concerts.

Following his principle that “the essence is rather more important than the form” Boris Grebenshchikov carried out numerous experiments in style. Looking for its own language the band went through jazz-rock, punk-rock, new wave, reggae, folk baroque, and even hard rock stages. Instrumental experimentation made Aquarium a big-band with a great wind section, a rock group with up-to-date electronic equipment, an acoustic guitar and cello duet, etc. one after another. Under the influence of Sergei Kuryokhin, Aquarium was for some time inclined to free form music, and Grebenshchikov himself took part in recording music by Kuryokhin and his group Popular Mechanics. The success of the group with the general public was enabled by magnitizdat (copying of “forbidden” music using cassette tapes in Soviet times: editor’s note). In 1984, Aquarium stopped its activities and its participants went into separate music projects. After the group’s reunion in 1986, it gave a number of large concerts in the sport palace Yubileyniy in Leningrad, which was evidence of Aquarium’s legalisation and the first step towards removing the regulations against rock music in Leningrad and the country in general.

Website: http://www.aquariumband.com/main.html

February 14, 2007

Vera Ivanova and Mikhail Manykin

Russia InfoCentre

www.russia-ic.com

FOUR NEW SAINTS AND THE QUEST FOR ORTHODOX UNITY IN NORTH AMERICA, Part Two

st-alexis-of-wilkes-barre.jpg

An Orthodox Life of the Righteous Priest Alexis of Wilkes-Barre

(+ 24 April/7 May 1909)

The Righteous Priest Alexis was born into a poor Carpatho-Russian family in what is now Slovakia, in the then Austro-Hungarian Empire, on 18 March 1854. That was the 800th anniversary of the Roman Catholic schism of 1054. Like many others in the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Toths’ ancestors had been forced into becoming Uniats in the seventeenth or eighteenth centuries. Alexis’ father, and later his brother, was a priest and he received an excellent education. He spoke several languages (Carpatho-Russian, Hungarian, Russian, German, Latin) and could also read Greek).

Alexis married a priest’s daughter and was ordained on 18 April 1878 to serve as second priest in a Uniat parish. His wife died soon afterwards, followed by their only child - losses which the saint endured with the patience of Job. In May 1879 Fr Alexis was appointed secretary to the Bishop of Presov, the main city in north-eastern Slovakia. He was also put in charge of diocesan administration and entrusted with running an orphanage. At seminary in Presov Fr Alexis also taught Church history and canon law, which served him well in later life. Fr Alexis did not serve long as a teacher or administrator. In October 1889 he was appointed to serve in a Uniat parish in Minneapolis, Minnesota, to where many Carpatho-Russian had been forced to emigrate by the poverty imposed on them by the cruel Roman Catholic Hungarian regime.

Upon his arrival in America, Fr Alexis presented himself to the local Roman Catholic bishop, Archbishop John Ireland. The latter was so ignorant that he did not understand the Uniats and was one of those who favoured the ‘Americanization’ of all Roman Catholics. Naturally, non-Latin rite clergy did not fit into this scheme. Thus, when Fr Alexis came to present his credentials, Archbishop Ireland showed him open hostility. He refused to recognize him as a priest or grant him permission to serve in his diocese. As a historian and professor of canon law, Fr Alexis knew that he could not accept the Archbishop’s decision.

In October 1890 there was a meeting of eight of the ten Uniat priests in America at Wilkes-Barre, about a hundred miles to the north-west of New York City in Pennsylvania, under the chairmanship of Fr Alexis. By this time panicking American bishops had written to Rome demanding the recall to Europe of all Uniat priests in America, fearing that Uniat priests and parishes would hinder them in their secularist schemes. Moreover, intimidated Uniat bishops in Europe refused to listen to the priests’ pleas for help. Archbishop Ireland sent a letter to his parishes ordering the people not to attend Fr Alexis’ parish, nor to accept any priestly ministrations from him.

Expecting imminent deportation, Fr Alexis explained the situation to his Carpatho-Russian parishioners and suggested that it might be better for him to return to Europe. ‘No’, they said. ‘Let’s go to the Russian bishop. Why should we always submit ourselves to foreigners?’ They decided to write to the Russian consul in San Francisco to ask for the name and address of the Russian bishop. A parishioner went to San Francisco to make initial contact with the Russian Bishop Vladimir, then in February 1891 Fr Alexis and his church warden made the journey. Subsequently, Bishop Vladimir came to Minneapolis and on 25 March 1891 received Fr Alexis and 361 parishioners into the Orthodox Church of their ancestors. The parishioners regarded this event as a new Triumph of Orthodoxy, crying: ‘Glory to God for His great mercy!’

This initiative had come from the people themselves and was not the result of any coercion from outside. The Russian Orthodox Church had been unaware of the existence of Slav Uniat immigrants to America, but had responded positively to their petition to be reunited to their Mother Church. The example of Fr Alexis and his parish in returning to Orthodoxy was to become an encouragement to thousands of other Uniats. Fr Alexis was like a candle upon a candlestick, giving light to others and his flock may be likened to the leaven which leavened the whole. Fr Alexis’ fearless preaching uprooted the tares which had sprung up in the wheat of the true faith, and exposed the false teachings which had led his people astray. He did not hesitate to point out Roman Catholic heresies and had to defend the Russian Orthodox Church and its American Mission from unfounded accusations. His opponents, like those of so many us who struggle for the Church Truth, were characterized by intolerance, rudeness, dishonesty and threats against him and his parishioners.

Yet, when Fr Alexis was offended or deceived by other people he forgave them. In the midst of great hardships, this herald of Orthodox theology and sound doctrine poured forth an inexhaustible stream of writings and gave practical advice on how to live in an Orthodox manner. Fr Alexis was slandered by his Roman Catholic enemies and accused of selling out his Carpatho-Russian people and faith for financial gain. But in reality he did not receive any financial support for a long time and his parish was very poor. Until a priestly salary arrived from Russia, Fr Alexis was obliged to work in a bakery to support himself. Even though his funds were meagre, he did not neglect to give alms to the poor and needy. He shared his money with other clergy even worse off than himself and contributed to the building of churches and education of seminarians in Minneapolis. Trusting in God to take care of him, Fr Alexis followed the admonition of Our Saviour ‘to seek first the kingdom of God’. So he bore tribulation, slander, and physical attacks with patience and spiritual joy.

Bishop Vladimir, Bishop Nicholas, Bishop, later St Tikhon, the founder of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, then Russian Bishop in North America, and finally Bishop Platon, all recognized the special gifts of Fr Alexis. They often sent him out to preach and teach. Fr Alexis did not hesitate or make excuses, but immediately and obediently carried out his tasks. He visited many Uniat parishes, explaining the differences between the Orthodox Church and Protestantism, Roman Catholicism and Uniatism, stressing that the path to salvation is in the Church alone. Fr Alexis was instrumental in forming or returning seventeen parishes to the Church, planting a vineyard of Christ in America, and increasing its fruitful yield many times over. By 1909, the time of his blessed repose, tens of thousands of Carpatho-Russian and also Galician Uniats had returned to Orthodoxy.

Who can tell of the saint’s spiritual struggles? Who can speak of the prayers which his soul poured forth to God? He prayed to God in secret with all modesty, with contrition and inward tears. God, Who sees everything done in secret, rewarded the saint. It is inconceivable that Fr Alexis could have accomplished his apostolic labours unless God had blessed and strengthened him for such work. His efforts did not go unrecognized in his own lifetime. He received a jewelled mitre from the Holy Synod in Russia, as well as the Order of St Vladimir and the Order of St Anna from the future Tsar-Martyr Nicholas II, for distinguished service and devotion to God and his people. In 1907 he was considered as a candidate for the episcopate. He declined this honour, however, humbly pointing out that it should be given to a younger man.

At the end of 1908, Fr Alexis’ health began to decline on account of various illnesses. He went to the seaside in southern New Jersey in an attempt to regain his health, but soon returned to Wilkes-Barre, where he was confined for two months. He reposed on Friday 24 April 1909 (7 May on the secular calendar), the feast of St Alexis the Hermit of the Kiev Caves. In his last will and testament Fr Alexis commended his soul to God’s mercy, asking forgiveness from everyone and forgiving everybody.

Fr Alexis was a true man of God who had guided many Carpatho-Russian and Galician immigrants through the dark confusion of religious challenges in the New World and back to the unity of the Russian Orthodox Church through his grace-filled words and by his holy example. He was glorified in 1994. The realization of his holiness was to take 85 years, as the rest of the Russian Orthodox Church in North America was preparing to glorify St John of San Francisco (+ 1966). We cannot doubt that it was the intercession of St John that Fr Alexis should be glorified before him, for he had preceded him in his earthly life. St Alexis relics now rest at St Tikhon’s Russian Orthodox Monastery in South Canaan, Pennsylvania, where faithful Orthodox come to venerate them and ask for the saint’s intercessions on their behalf.

Holy and Righteous Father Alexis, Pray to God for us!

The MP needs to establish at least 20 to 25 new churches for Overseas Russians

metropolitan-kirill-of-smolensk-2.jpgMoscow, 27 November 2007 (Interfax):

Metropolitan Kirill of Smolensk and Kaliningrad, the head of the Moscow Patriarchate Department for External Church Relations, spoke of the necessity to build new churches for overseas Russians. “Increasingly, today, our compatriots turn to us [and give us] requests to organise a parish or to build a church. [Based on the] the number of our compatriots abroad, we need to build 20 to 25 new churches outside of Russia as a ‘minimal programme’’’, Metropolitan Kirill said while opening the conference Compatriots and the Business World in Moscow. According to the metropolitan, after signing the Act of Canonical Communion with the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, the number of Russian Orthodox parishes in non-CIS states has doubled, and it now totals 600.

Metropolitan Kirill also “thanked God that the Moscow Patriarchate managed to keep its unity in the [successor states of the] former USSR, even in the most difficult places”. For example, in Estonia and in the Ukraine, schismatic groups were set up to tear Orthodox believers away from the Moscow Patriarchate. “However, they did not succeed in either case. Today, the overwhelming majority of the believers in these countries belong to the Moscow Patriarchate”, the metropolitan said according to the official website of the Moscow Patriarchate.

Interfax-Religion

www.interfax.ru

A Girl in our Neighbourhood

A light-hearted little fun song with no pretence or heaviness. It is not great art, but, it has a catchy tune, and it is very pleasant, indeed. Not all the songs from the Soviet times were about heroic tractor drivers or buxom heroine milk-maids. It is accompanied by some nice late Soviet neo-Impressionist art. Smile and relax… see, that wasn’t hard! (Yes… this is Russian culture too!)

FOUR NEW SAINTS AND THE QUEST FOR ORTHODOX UNITY IN NORTH AMERICA, Part One

synaxis.jpg

INTRODUCTION

There are several saints with North American connections, many of them Russians connected with Russian Alaska, the first part of the Continent to become Orthodox. Among these we cannot fail to mention Sts Herman, Juvenal, Innocent and Jacob of Alaska and the native Protomartyr of America, St Peter the Aleut, tortured to death by Jesuits in San Francisco some 200 years ago. There are also other Russian saints, who lived for a time in North America, but then returned to their homeland and were martyred by the anti-Russian Communists. Among them were the former Bishop of San Francisco, Patriarch Tikhon, and two priests who served for a time in Chicago and New York, Fr John (Kochurov) and Fr Alexander (Khotovitsky).

However, in the last thirteen years, four saints who all actually reposed in the USA have been canonized. They are St Alexis of Wilkes-Barre (1994), St John of San Francisco (1994), St Raphael of Brooklyn (2000) and St Nicholas of Libertyville (2003). Never again will it be said that North America has no saints. Coming from today’s countries of Slovakia, Ukraine, Syria and Serbia, these four saints were of four different nationalities, representing four homelands of Orthodoxy: Eastern Central Europe, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and the Balkans. Through their different origins and generations they represent the Catholicity of the Church and through their lives, the Apostolicity of the Church. Moreover, unlike today, both St Alexis and St Raphael, who knew one another, belonged to a united Orthodox Church in North America under the multinational and multilingual Russian Orthodox Church. Later, St John, who had known St Nicholas in Serbia, was an exemplary representative of this same Russian Church and St Nicholas was its great friend and servant. All these saints served on the same Orthodox calendar, a symbol of their real unity.

At a time when much-divided Orthodox in North America are searching for unity, it seems that there can be no more obvious solution than to look for this unity in the lives of these four saints. Unlike on Earth, the Church in Heaven is One. This is because the Church is also Holy, for there is no Unity without Holiness. And these four men, ‘Catholic and Apostolic’, as we have said above, also represent the Oneness and Holiness of the Church. If there is no unity in the Orthodox Church in North America today, with its multitude of often protestantized, secularized and compromised jurisdictions, it must surely be because Orthodox there today have not remained faithful to the holy deposit of these four saints, because they have not looked for holiness. Like the Four Evangelists, these four saints were always focused on the One Christ, the One Church and the One Tradition, which they followed in faithfulness to their calling by the Holy Spirit, refusing to be distracted by secular politics or heterodox errors.

Of course, it may be said, and perhaps rightly, that with the Russian Church enslaved by Communism for most of the twentieth century and barely functioning within the straitjacket of the Cold War, disunity, compromise and lack of leadership among Orthodox in North America were inevitable. However, today, when the Russian Church is free and reunited once more, there is no more justification for disunity. May the examples of these four saints be a wake-up call to all Orthodox in North America to unite once more around the same Orthodox values which united them, a call to return to the pre-1917 roots of North American Orthodoxy. For if Orthodox in North America do not unite around the values of holiness, the values of these four saints, then the Orthodox dioceses of North America will never be worthy of unity. For although holiness is given by the grace of God, unity requires our human repentance.

Perhaps, soon, an Icon will be painted of these four holy immigrant and refugee Orthodox. The four of them will stand by the sides of the Icon, looking towards Christ Risen in glory. Standing at the bottom right, St Raphael of Brooklyn will represent the Evangelist Matthew, who wrote for the Semite peoples, standing at the top right, St Alexis of Wilkes-Barre will represent the Evangelist Mark, who wrote for the Gentiles, standing at the top left, St Nicholas of Libertyville will represent the learned Evangelist St Luke, who wrote as an educated man and, standing at the bottom left, St John the bishop-theologian of San Francisco will of course represent the Evangelist and Theologian John. Perhaps such an icon of ‘the Four Apostles of North America’ could help to bring us all back to the ‘One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church’, back to our Orthodox senses at last.

Holy Apostles of North America, pray to God for us!

Metropolitan Anthony Bloom: On the Fiftieth Anniversary of His Consecration

(editor’s note: There is a small group of less than 1,000 people calling themselves the “Diocese of Amphipolis” who claim the legacy of Metropolitan Anthony. They are schismatics and disturbers of the church order, and Archbishop Innokenty Vasiliev (the ruling diocesan) rightfully has nothing to do with them. We should follow Vladyki Innokenty’s example.)

It was fifty years ago that Anthony Bloom, later to be known as Metropolitan Anthony of Sourozh, was consecrated bishop on the feast day of St Gregory of Neocaesarea, 30 November 1957. Today, there are many people who remember him, and each one has his own memories. He was able to express the most complex ideas in the simplest language, making them understandable for both the learned and the simple. He had the ability to speak to many, making each one feel the centre of his attention, [treating everyone] as important and valuable people. He was never a “sweetie”. He took care that nobody hissed at his neighbour in his church. When he celebrated a service, all departed from church as if it had been a joyful event.

He loved Russia. He said that had he been younger and not bound by his ministry he would have gone there. He taught that the Gospel spoke of love, that love is the ultimate meaning of Christ’s good news, and he made this gospel-love real for all who met him. One could meet him thousands of miles away from London when he spoke on BBC. For many, it was a drink of truth in the desert of materialism. He won his hearer with his manner of speech, his intonation, his special manner of pronouncing words, and his wonderfully pure Russian language. Of course, it was not how he spoke, but, what he spoke, that attracted people.

He said that when he was fourteen he opened a book of the New Testament and felt God’s presence. During the rest of his life he was tirelessly looking. He was a preacher. A man of prayer. A pastor. A labourer. A minister of the great and tremendous mysteries of God. And, of course, he was a bishop… Within the Russian Church he shaped a unique diocese, in which there was “neither Greek nor Jew”. It was there that citizens of England, one of the countries of Europe most distant from Russia, could recognise in Orthodoxy their own ancient faith. They saw it, and they wanted it back.

Now, when he is gone, we really miss him. The Orthodox community of the British Isles has lost their father in Christ… but, they now have their own saint praying for them in heaven. And it is prayer that is the most needful and meaningful [thing] in our Christian faith.

27 November 2007

Fr Mikhail Dudko

Interfax-Religion

www.interfax.ru

The Enemy is at the Gates!

The Red Army Chorus sings The March of the Defenders of Moscow against a kaleidoscopic collection of photos, posters, and paintings. Some of the paintings are from the hands of contemporary Russian art students of high-school age. There is a future for our art and motherland!

Moscow Patriarchate Suggests that Russian Hotels Provide Worship Rooms and Bibles for their Guests

Moscow, 9 July 2007 (Interfax):

The Moscow Patriarchate proposed measures asking hoteliers to be more considerate of the needs of their religious customers. “Every year, millions in Russia, including many pilgrims, travel and stay in hotels. Believers would appreciate service that was considerate of their religious feelings”, Bishop Mark of Yegoryevsk, the vice-chairman of the Moscow Patriarchate Department for External Church Relations, told Interfax.

According to Bishop Mark, nearly 2 million pilgrims travel to visit Russian shrines every year. “It would be greatly welcome if bibles (or at least New Testaments and prayer books) were in hotel rooms. It would be also nice if the hoteliers have [available] icons for believers who ask for them, so that they could say their devotions in their room, and use the hotel intranet to broadcast movies about local shrines and moral values”, he said.

To give an example of [how hotels could give] better service, Bishop Mark mentioned that Moscow railway terminals and airports have chapels and worship rooms. “It would be good to have at least one worship room per hotel. Travellers could rest their minds there, because those who travel often have stress, and they really need prayer”, the bishop said. In Western countries, he said, “bibles are always available” in the rooms, and “some hotels have chapels”.

According to Bishop Mark, concerts of Sunday school children might be organised in hotel lobbies on religious feast days. “There is nothing wrong if they decorate the hotel in a special way for a feast day. It might give people positive feelings”, he said. “Being ashamed of one’s feasts or religious traditions is the same thing as being ashamed of one’s parents, ethnic background, or face… Under the Soviet régime, believers were treated as second-class citizens. Today, we ought to overcome that”, Bishop Mark said. Since most Russians consider themselves Orthodox in one way or another, he proposed that the Church should bless Russian hotels.

Interfax-Religion

www.interfax.ru

Modern Knights

To arms! Keep the line! Watch out! You may be shocked, and you may think somebody has turned time backwards, if you find yourself in the fourteenth or thirteenth century among people wearing armour with swords and shields in their hands. However, there is nothing to be afraid of; these are members of one among many historic reconstruction clubs, which are winning more popularity with every passing year. Apart from the many Tolkien enthusiasts recreating the storybook world of Middle-earth, numerous followers of medieval culture bring to life pictures and imagery that once existed.

There is one mandatory rule for all newcomers, the clothing and arms must be authentic. One day, I happened to attend a jousting match where I was witness of how strictly they enforced the rules. One young man’s plate amour did not meet the requirements for authenticity, so, they did not allow him to participate. You should have seen his face! This moment undoubtedly destroyed all his hopes to win. However, armour is not the only important thing; they inspect clothing and shoes closely, too. Therefore, you had better say goodbye to trainers, and be ready to wear an ancient style of boots, which are unlikely to be comfortable.

Well, if you put up with the uniform, do not forget the armour, especially as it weights as much as 20, or even 25, kilos. Wearing a four-kilogram helmet is not as easy as it may seem, so, a real warrior must be strong, otherwise he will not stand all these pieces of iron pressing down on him.

 Every year, thousands of modern knights go to Vyborg, which is not far from St Petersburg, to reconstruct the assault of the Vyborg fortress. For three days, they live in tents, cook dinner over a fire, sing ancient songs, and certainly fight. An average unsophisticated onlooker can be greatly impressed with the scene of the battle, when two opposing crushes burn the Earth, trying to stab the enemy. The clash of swords and the noise of the armoured men crashing into each other makes one cover your ears with your hands, especially if you are a girl, who are not rare birds at such events. Mostly, they accompany their husbands or boyfriends and play the role of typical medieval women, obeying their masters. Why do they do it?

 If you get on with some of these people, you will see they come from different social classes. There are students, workers, managers, accountants, and even bosses, but their intense desire to introduce the culture of our ancestors is so absorbing that it unites them into one big family. Besides, this is an extreme kind of sport, which lets contemporary men feel that they are true representatives of the sterner sex.

2 November 2006

Olga Pletneva

Russia-InfoCentre

www.russia-ic.com

Next Page »


Blog Stats

  • 103,422 hits

 

November 2007
M T W T F S S
    Dec »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930