Today, the leadership of the US Republican Party, despite its recent seeming victory in November’s national elections, is in disarray. The reputation of the GOP has suffered grievous blows…
Scandal tainted the most prominent members of the party leadership. Top Republicans are desperately trying to save face amidst the outrage surrounding Sarah Palin’s alleged involvement in the 8 January shooting spree in Arizona, which left six people dead and over a dozen wounded, including Democratic US Representative Gabrielle Giffords. Ms Palin didn’t deliver a gun to the killer, but she openly called for the elimination of Ms Giffords, all but calling for her assassination, labelling her obnoxious {do remember the “crosshairs”: editor}. At the same time, a court sentenced another leading Republican, Thomas DeLay, the former leader of the Republican caucus in the House of Representatives, to three years in prison on conspiracy and money laundering charges. At the top of the list of the Republican heavyweight lawbreakers was one of the most powerful of the party’s gurus, former Vice-President Richard Cheney. Adding fuel to the fire were the results of an official probe into last year’s massive BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, which investigators specifically blamed on energy services giant Halliburton, owned by Cheney. The report of the special government commission investigating the disaster stated that the tragedy was due to fatally flawed actions by the owners of the drilling platform, amongst which, together with BP, was Halliburton, Cheney’s company.
In the light of these scandals involving the leaders of the Republican Party, its attacks that claim that the actions of President Obama’s administration are injurious to the country lose their legitimacy, not least in the eyes of the public. Meanwhile, the old guard Republicans still assailed President Obama’s policies in very important areas. Until the last possible moment, they resisted the ratification of START-3. When they no longer had the power to obstruct ratification, they accompanied the ratification with a special resolution linking their agreement with a deal involving the favourite child of the American military-industrial complex… the so-called anti-ballistic missile defence programme. Contrary to the Treaty on the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, the defeated Republicans proposed “nuclear modernisation”, calling for the immediate production of 80 new nuclear warheads at “nuclear forges” in Tennessee, Kansas City, and Los Alamos, the birthplace of the first atomic bomb. Professor Hans Kristensen, the head of the Federation of American Scientists, with undisguised anxiety, said that if the US implements this programme, it “will launch a new nuclear era”. Moscow warned against such an approach, slamming the so-called nuclear modernisation programme that the Republicans are now pushing for. Not satisfied, top Republican figures lashed out at President Obama’s new version of the US National Security Strategy, as it recognised that the USA was unable to exercise sole leadership in the modern world. As the document points up, “The burdens of the 21st century can no longer be borne solely by US soldiers and citizens”.
The unfolding scandal at the top of the Republican Party (such as the brouhaha surrounding Sarah Palin) is an obstacle in its attempts to thwart the policies of the Obama Administration. However, this is only the tip of the iceberg. The very “success” of the recent rightwing election “victory” hindered their reaching their objective, no matter what they think, at present. There’s an array of reasons to explain why the Republican Party leaders lost their political clout. Firstly, their ambitions and the ambitions of those whose interests they represent don’t correspond to the reality of the modern world, nor does America have the capability to carry them out. The recent announcements concerning the massive federal deficit are another confirmation of this. In the end, policymakers will have to reckon with reality, no matter who has the majority in Congress, or who is in power in Washington and the White House.
2 February 2011
Valentin Zorin
A View from Moscow
Voice of Russia World Service
















