Archimandrite Tikhon Shevkunov (1958- ), Superior of the Sretensky Monastery in Moscow, father-confessor to Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and his family
Russian Orthodox Archimandrite Tikhon (born 1958 in Moscow Georgy Aleksandrovich Shevkunov) studied film production before entering the clergy, and when his first work as a director and narrator, the documentary The Fall of an Empire: The Lesson of Byzantium, was released earlier this year, it created an uproar! The film deals with the Empire’s degradation and how it lost its “ability to respond to the calls of history”. A Greek version has already been released and an English version is underway. Due to a reference to the Emperor Constantine as The Drunkard, not a few critics saw in the film a portrayal of the late President’s Yeltsin’s crumbling Russia and considered the documentary an attempt to help President Putin’s hand-picked successor and current President Dmitri Medvedev win the election.
In an electronic (conducted through e-mail) interview with NEO, his first for Greeks in the US, Tikhon dismissed these allegations. He admitted, however, that “the analogy with Russian history was more than obvious” and that “this film arose out of my pondering over the history of Byzantium and of Russia”. Archimandrite Tikhon’s advent in the ecclesiastical and political limelight seems to be a natural consequence of a path that led him to become, for some time now, one of the most influential people in Russia.
Instrumental in the reunification process that brought part of the Orthodox Church outside of Russia back to Moscow and a key person in organising President Putin’s one and only historic visit to Athos (although he himself denies any connection), Archimandrite Tikhon represents a new breed of leadership within the Russian Orthodox Church that takes history seriously, especially as it relates to today’s reality. On the hottest point of contention in Orthodoxy today, the status of the Ukrainian Church, he points up well-founded historical reasons that make the case so sensitive to Russians. “This is, in fact, part of an old Roman Catholic project worked out during the tragic Union of Brest in the Ukraine back in the 16th century”.
Fr Tikhon entered the Pskov-Caves Monastery as a novice in 1984 and, today, he is the Superior of the Moscow Sretensky Monastery, one of the most influential in the country, and Rector of the Sretensky Theological Seminary. Multi-tasked and extremely active, he is Editor-in-Chief of the Sretensky Monastery Publishing House, one of the largest in Russia, Editor-in-Chief of Pravoslavie.ru, one of the leading Orthodox Internet sites in the country, and an Associate Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences. Reminded of the upcoming 39th Biennial Clergy-Laity Congress of the Greek-American Orthodox Church (Washington DC, 13-18 July 2008,) Fr Tikhon, who has been to the US many times, said he considers this traditional congress a model for something similar in Russia. Energetic and open to new ideas, he sees changes “into the external spheres of Church life” as inevitable, but “they must be conducted in a spiritually talented way, and not superficially, primitively, or basely. Otherwise, the Church will fatally consign itself to cruel divisions and suffering”.
******
Coat of arms of the Empire of New Rome, mistakenly called “Byzantine” or “Byzantium” in the West. The eagle looks in both directions, east and west. The Romaioi were not merely “Easterners”, that is a Roman Catholic “misunderstanding”.
Demetrios Rhompotis
How did you come up with the idea of this documentary?
Archimandrite Tikhon Shevkunov
When I had the opportunity to visit Constantinople for the first time two years ago, I was amazed by what I saw. Even after these many centuries, the magnitude and grandeur of a Christian empire’s fall shows through. Because the analogy with Russian history was more than obvious, I was exceedingly interested as to how this extraordinarily vital, capable, and enlightened empire, far surpassing all other nations of its time, suddenly lost its life forces and finally collapsed. Why did this great nation, enlightened with the light of the Gospels, lose its historical home to another, more primitive, state and people? This film arose out of my pondering over the history of Byzantium and of Russia. Work on this film went on for a year and a half. The idea consisted in showing the process and causes of degradation, how the Empire lost its ability to respond to the calls of history. This was the main subject of my research, and attention was paid first of all to those historical facts connected with this matter.
Demetrios Rhompotis
In this country, during the last decade mostly, we have witnessed the meddling of certain Christian sects in partisan politics putting in danger the separation of Church and state and compromising, sometimes irrevocably, Christianity’s integrity. Is there a similar situation in Russia? In fact, you have been accused of doing so by releasing the film right before the Russian presidential election.
Archimandrite Tikhon Shevkunov
Yes, such accusations were directed at the film. However, some said that the film supported Putin’s successor, while others said that it was aimed against him. I pay no attention to such criticism. There was criticism that the film modernised Byzantine history by introducing such terms as “oligarchs” and “corrupt politicians”. Yes, this is true. History was consciously reconstructed to our contemporary reality, and terminology was used with a large audience in mind. Nevertheless, all the facts presented in the film are absolutely true. Or, for example, there was criticism that nothing was said about the overblown Western concept of “Byzantine deceitfulness”. There was an obvious attempt by the Western Europeans after the vicious fourth Crusade to accuse their victims, the Greeks, in order to justify themselves. It would be more appropriate to speak of how the motives and behaviour of a highly developed Byzantine state were rarely fully understood by the simpler inhabitants of Medieval Western Europe, just as the inhabitants of a large city seem cunning to a simple country boy.
Coat of arms of the Russian Empire. Do note the similarity with the arms of New Rome. Russia is not only the political descendent of New Rome, but, Moscow is the spiritual successor of Constantinopolis Nea Romana. New Rome fell to the heathen Turk in 1453, Moscow picked up its banner, and, in fact, helped to free her spiritual mother (Greece) in the 19th century. Tsargrad, alas, is still under the Turkish boot. We Russians do not forget the Tragedy of Ionia and the New Martyrs of Ataturk’s yoke.
Demetrios Rhompotis
Archbishop Demetrios of America, during his recent visit to Russia, spoke of “unchurched people” in the US and in other western societies. Can today’s Orthodoxy appeal to them, is our Church able to “speak their language”, to offer a spiritual, yet, realistic alternative?
Archimandrite Tikhon Shevkunov
After 80 years of militant atheism, Russians have gained unique experience not only in preserving Orthodoxy under the conditions of a totalitarian state, but, also of an active contemporary Orthodox mission within one’s own nation, in a society that is often called “post-Christian”. The main bearers of Orthodox spirit were the new martyrs and confessors of Russia. Amongst those confessors were those who lived even to our own days. One of these was my spiritual father, Archimandrite Ioann (Krestiankin), who lived through the Stalinist camps. He remained unbroken, and was an example of the greatest Christian love and faith to the end of his life. He also had an amazing gift of discernment, which the Holy Fathers call the crown of the spiritual ascetic life. His remarkable pastoral letters were recently published (they have also been translated into English) and were distributed throughout Russia by the thousands.
The problem of missionary work in the contemporary Russian Church is of the utmost importance. I can say that we are gradually finding the right language of communication with the modern, ecclesiastically uneducated individual, to which the million-fold printings of our missionary apologetic brochures and books can testify. In Sretensky Monastery, which is located in the centre of Moscow, half of the parishioners are under 40 years of age. They are high school and elementary school students, government officials, scholars, public servants, workers, and cultural activists. Answering the last part of your question, I will say that, for these people, the Gospels and Holy Fathers are a spiritual and realistic alternative to the corrupt secular world which is increasingly senseless without God, as they have been throughout all times.
Demetrios Rhompotis
Many of those “unchurched people” and many of the “churched” as well, resort to kinds of New Age “spiritual” options that we thought gone forever. Magicians, astrologists, fortune-tellers, and wizards are in vogue, a phenomenon reminiscent of Europe’s Dark Ages. Does a void exist that established religions do not fill and does the religious version of Orthodoxy fall in the same category?
Archimandrite Tikhon Shevkunov
We ran up against this problem in the beginning of the ‘90’s, but, in general, this is nothing new. The same thing happened in Byzantium, especially during its period of decline. The spectrum was very broad, from the sophisticated pagan teachings of Gemistos Plithon to the most crude and blasphemous superstitions. In Russia, today, with God’s help, we have been able to convince our flock of the incompatibility of any kind of superstition with life in the Church. Although, of course, this sickness flares up here and there, it is localised, whilst the Church as a whole does not suffer from it.
The Baptism of Grand Princess St Olga (Part 1 of the triptych Holy Rus) (Sergei Kirillov, 1992). This portrays her baptism at the great cathedral of Agia Sofia (Holy Wisdom) in Constantinopolis Nea Romana. Unfortunately, Agia Sofia was profaned by the Turks, who turned it into a mosque. The war cry of the Russian troops in 1878 and 1914 was “Na Tsargrad!” (“To Tsargrad!”). The West always opposed the liberation of Tsargrad by Orthodox Russia, and supported its occupation by the heathen Turks.
Demetrios Rhompotis
People say that Orthodoxy, with all its beauty and transcendental qualities, is antiquated in many ways. It seems to have stopped developing a couple of centuries ago, resembling the Amish in that sense. On the other hand, efforts to modernise it are greeted with suspicion and hostility. As a new generation clergyman, and a very talented film director, I should add, what are your thoughts on this vital question?
Archimandrite Tikhon Shevkunov
We have firmly assimilated from the great Greek Fathers the teaching of the eternally-young Church. Russia is now in a period where a large number of people are entering the Church, especially young and educated people. The Russian Athonite Elder Silouan wrote about this back in the 1930’s. He spoke of the future of Russia, that there would come a time when mostly educated people would be coming to God.
As for the modernisation of Orthodoxy (I will emphasise that this concerns only the ritual side of the Church and not the Evangelical and Patristic side), life and times are bound to introduce their necessary changes into the external spheres of Church life. The most important thing is that those reforms be truly necessary to life and introduced with love for Orthodoxy, and not with high-minded contempt for “routine and Orthodox limitation”. Another very important point is that these changes be conducted in a spiritually talented way, and not superficially, primitively, or basely. Otherwise, the Church will fatally consign itself to cruel divisions and suffering.
Demetrios Rhompotis
Although you don’t belong to any “anti-Hellenic” group within the Russian Orthodox Church, certain points in your documentary can be rendered as hostile to Hellenism. In your opinion, can there be an Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church without the Greek–spirited Church Fathers and the Hellenic tradition in which they and the early church was steeped in?
Archimandrite Tikhon Shevkunov
I must admit that this is the first I have heard of an “anti-Hellenic” group in the Russian Church. The vast majority of Russians have always related to the Greek Church as to their spiritual mother, toward whom we feel sincere love and reverence. Greek Holy Fathers and ascetics of piety, from St John Chrysostom to St Paisius the Athonite are published in Russian by the hundreds of thousands of copies. Very many students of theological institutions study the ancient and Modern Greek language. The Russian Church is penetrated with Greek spiritual patristic tradition.
As for the film, the subject of the sad phenomenon of neo-paganism which arose amongst the Greeks in Byzantium does in fact come up in the context of understanding the many causes underlying the Empire’s collapse, especially during the final century of its existence. This is an important subject for Modern Russia, because neo-paganism is raising his ugly head here as well. It is stated that, by force of many factors, Byzantium, in the person of its ruling elite, gradually denied its own governmental and spiritual foundations and traditions, and later its Divine calling. Similar processes have taken place in Russia, and it is very important for us to see the consequences of these processes in history. It is stated in the film that Greek nationalism did a great disservice to the Empire at one point, making enemies out of former friends. This same thing is happening, unfortunately, in Russia. But, these sad historical facts should help us to think about our contemporary life. As the Russian historian Kliuchevsky said, “History is not a kind, old teacher, but a stern instructor; it does not ask about lessons, but, it cruelly avenges their negligence”.
The Call to Arms of Kuzma Minin in 1611 in Novgorod (Konstantin Makovsky, 1880s). Kuzma Minin was a butcher by trade and one of the leaders of the Opolchenie, the Russian host that threw out the Poles in 1612. They were attempting to convert Russia to Uniatism by the sword. They failed.
Demetrios Rhompotis
Russian and other Eastern European churches have suffered, and are suffering, from the activities of Uniates, a very treacherous process sanctioned by the Vatican, in which appearances are kept intact, whilst the Faith is essentially compromised. This is one of the major obstacles in the dialogue, really, what kind of a dialogue can you sustain with someone who claims to be infallible, between the schismatic Romans and the Ecumenical Patriarchate. What is your take on that?
Archimandrite Tikhon Shevkunov
I will return once again to the film. Many critics reproach the film as being “anti-Western”. This is not true. Two things are very clearly stated about the Roman Catholic West, “Of course, it is senseless to say that the West was to blame for Byzantium’s misfortunes and fall. The West was only pursuing its own interests, which is quite natural. Byzantium’s historical blows occurred when the Byzantines themselves betrayed their own principles upon which their empire was established …The Byzantines were supposed to get the point that the West needed only complete and unconditional religious and political submission. Not only the Pope was to be recognised as infallible, but, the West itself as well”.
These two postulates, the exclusiveness of their own interests and their infallibility, as it seems to me, remain unchanged in the Vatican’s policies even now. It would be naïve, at the least, not to take these two basics constants of Roman Catholicism into consideration. As for the Uniates, those who now talk today, for example, about autocephaly for the Ukrainian Church, forget that this is, in fact part, of an old Roman Catholic project worked out during the tragic Union of Brest in the Ukraine back in the 16th century. Later, the leader of the Ukrainian Greek-Catholics, Metropolitan Andrei Sheptitsky, wrote in a letter to Emperor Franz Joseph in 1914 that, in order to make the Ukraine Roman Catholic, it is necessary to separate it from the Russian Church, create a “Kiev-Galician Orthodox Patriarchate” and, then, soon afterwards, transfer it to the “bosom of the Catholic Church” through the Uniate process. Of course, one could say to me in the words of Heraclitus, “You can’t go down the same river twice”. This is true, of course… But, you can easily jump into one and the same puddle.
Demetrios Rhompotis
What message would you like to convey to the American Greek-Orthodox people as this year’s Clergy-Laity Congress is about to commence?
Archimandrite Tikhon Shevkunov
Much of what is important to me and many priests in the Russian Church has already been mentioned in this discussion. I would only like to add that our experience of life and witness of the Church during the era of a totalitarian regime belongs not only to us, but to the entire Orthodox Church. Your experience of the Church’s existence in a pluralistic society is very important to us, as is your experience of pastoral service. For example, we do not have such annual conferences of clergy and laypeople as you have in America. It would be extremely interesting and important for us to take on this tradition and experience. Greek Orthodoxy has always been for Russia not only an instructor, but, also a special spiritual orientation. Thus do we highly value our spiritual unity in our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and in His Holy Church.
June 2008
Demetrios Rhompotis
NEO Magazine
www.neomagazine.com/ 2008_06_june/2008_06_10.html (in English)
A Girl in a White Dress ( I. L. Rusov, 1954)
Barbara-Marie Drezhlo
