Voices from Russia

Saturday, 27 April 2013

RF Gosduma Ratifies Child Abuse Convention

00 Putin with child. 07.10.12

______________________________

On Friday, The RF Gosduma approved Russia’s accession to the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse. The convention opened for signing in 2007, and it came into force on 1 July 2010. Russia signed the convention in 2012. To date, 46 states have signed and 26 states have ratified the convention, which sets out international standards for protecting children against sexual exploitation and abuse. The Gosduma also ratified the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution, and Child Pornography. The UN General Assembly adopted the protocol on 25 May 2000. Russia signed the protocol in 2012. According to the protocol, the signatory countries must stipulate criminal, civil, or administrative penalties for selling children for sexual exploitation, organ transfers for profit, or forced labour, as well as for improperly inducing consent, as an intermediary, to a child’s adoption in violation of the applicable international legal instruments on adoption. These offenses include offering, obtaining, procuring, or providing a child for child prostitution and producing, distributing, disseminating, importing, exporting, offering, selling, or possessing child pornography.

26 April 2013

RIA-Novosti

http://en.rian.ru/russia/20130426/180862132/Duma-Ratifies-Child-Abuse-Convention.html

Editor’s Note:

The USA added the following caveat to the Protocol upon its ratification of the instrument in 2002:

(1) NO ASSUMPTION OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD. The United States understands that the United States assumes no obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child by becoming a party to the Protocol.

http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-c&chapter=4&lang=en

That is, the Bush Administration and the Republican Party stated baldly that the ratification of the Protocol added NO additional protection for American children. Sexual predators have “rights”, dontcha know! That’s what “freedom” means for the GOP… along with predatory buccaneer crapitalism, toothless labour laws, mind-boggling greed, and the lightest of tax burdens upon the rich. If you vote for such, that’s what you vote for, full stop. It puts a new face on the posturing moralisers (especially, the smarmy self-righteous Evangelicals), doesn’t it? None dare call it evil… especially, not the well-paid and bovine American news media

BMD

Friday, 5 April 2013

Pope Francisco Vows to Grapple with Sex Abuse

00 Pope Francisco Bergoglio. 14.03.13

______________________________

On Friday, Pope Francisco Bergoglio urged Vatican congregations to act “with determination” against sexual abuse committed by members of the Catholic clergy, the Holy See said in a statement, the pope’s first public pronouncement on the topic. The Vatican said, referring to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which handles such cases, after the pope met with its director, “In particular, the Holy Father asked that the congregation … act with determination in cases of sexual abuse”.

The Catholic Archbishop of Durban, Wilfrid Fox Napier, described paedophilia as a psychological “illness, not a criminal condition”. The South African cardinal told the BBC that people who were themselves abused as children, and, then, abused others, need to be examined by doctors. He was one of 115 cardinals who took part in the Vatican conclave that elected Pope Francisco.

Recently, clerical sexual abuse scandals have dogged the Catholic Church. In an interview with the Stephen Nolan programme on BBC Radio 5 Live, Cardinal Napier referred to paedophilia as “a psychological condition, a disorder. What do you do with disorders? You’ve got to try and put them right. If I… as a normal being… choose to break the law, knowing that I’m breaking the law, then I think I need to be punished”. He said he knew at least two priests, who became paedophiles after themselves being abused as children, adding, “Now, don’t tell me that those people are criminally responsible like somebody who chooses to do something like that. I don’t think you can really take the position and say that person deserves to be punished. He was himself damaged”.

Cardinal Napier’s comments triggered immediate criticism. Barbara Dorries, who was abused by a priest when she was a child, works for the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, based in Chicago IL. She told the BBC, “If it’s a disease, that’s fine, but it’s also a crime, and crimes are punished, criminals are held accountable for what they did and what they do. The bishops and the cardinals have gone to great lengths to cover these crimes to enable the predators to move on, to not be arrested, and to keep the secrets within the church”.

Michael Walsh, who wrote a biography of late Pope John Paul II Wojtyła, said Cardinal Napier’s remarks were similar to the position once taken by the Catholic Church in the UK and the USA. Mr Walsh told the BBC, “At one time, they actually believed it was a condition that could be dealt with. Many bishops were simply moving priests and trying to disguise the fact that they’d been committing these crimes”. Marie Collins, who was a victim of abuse, told the BBC, “I think it’s appalling that we have a cardinal, a man at this level in the church, that can still hold these views. He’s totally ignoring the child”.

16 March/5 April 2013

Voice of Russia World Service

http://english.ruvr.ru/2013_04_05/Pope-Francis-vows-to-grapple-sex-abuse/

http://english.ruvr.ru/2013_03_16/Paedophilia-not-a-criminal-condition-Catholic-Archbishop-of-Durban/

Sunday, 13 January 2013

13 January 2013. RIA-Novosti Infographics. Our Children’s Rights

00 RIA-Novosti Infographics. Our Children’s Rights. 2013

______________________________

The most important rights that our children possess based on the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

13 January 2013

RIA-Novosti

http://en.rian.ru/infographics/20130113/178693232/Childrens_rights.html

Editor’s Note:

The US Republican Party has stalled American ratification of this document… it’s the only major holdout in the entire world (all other states worldwide save for Niue, the Cook Islands, Somalia, and the South Sudan have ratified this document since 1989). What does that tell you about GOP troglodytes and their deluded ideology? Draw the proper conclusions from that, kids. They’re full of vincible ignorance… don’t waste your time arguing with such zipperheads.

BMD

Tuesday, 23 October 2012

23 October 2012. Monomakhos Wants JP… JP Supported a Child Abuser… What’s Wrong With That Picture?

______________________________

Monomakhos is all hot n’ bothered about Fathausen. Let’s keep it simple… Fathausen supported the sodomite and child abuser Gleb Podmoshensky. It was so bad that all of the brotherhood left (save for Damascene Christiansen and Gerasim Eliel) Platina and the ROCOR Holy Synod shitcanned Podmoshensky for serving under suspension (Lebedeff admitted that the Synod was glad that it had this pretext, as it was scared to move on the abuse alone). I’ve been able to ascertain that Fathausen was Podmoshensky’s disciple for at least ten years. Fathausen went to Russia under Podmoshensky’s auspices… he was never an employee of the MP, nor was Russky Palomnik ever an official publication of the MP or any other recognised Local Church. Fathausen remained Podmoshensky’s disciple even after the ROCOR Holy Synod deposed him for nasty doings, even after the very public airing of Podmoshensky’s antics. I wonder, just how much of Fathausen’s affluent corporate daddy’s money went to support this pervert and his establishment? In short, Monomakhos wants a known supporter and proven disciple of a sanctioned child abuser and sodomite to “wear the white hat”.

A group on Monomuckos calls itself the “Sons of Job”… then, that must mean that they support Vladyki Job’s compassionate stance towards oikonomia (if they don’t, they’re shit-spattered hypocrites). That is, in particular, it means that they support Bishop Job’s nuanced and pastoral attitude towards homosexuality, as evidenced by his actions towards Mark Stokoe. Everybody knew that Mark was gay… everybody (including me… I’m NOT the best-informed sort out there; I’m only the best-informed sort who talks openly of some matters). Not only that, it was well-known for YEARS. That is, Vladyki Job bloody-well-knew that Mark was gay, so, it must mean that the Sons of Job support Vladyki Job’s Christ-like compassion and forgiveness.

WRONG!

The Sons of Job are the Sons of Belial! They’re phonies… they’re poseurs! They want a witch-hunt of the “pure” (them) against immoral sorts (the rest of us). They get to be the judges and we get to be lunch. Hey… there’s something WRONG with that picture, kids… and, y’know what? These demented toddlers are going to find out that they tangled with the wrong bunch. I want to see them face down the po-nashemu people. Our dedes worked in the mines and mills, our babas waited at the scene of more than one industrial accident. Our dads fought in World War II, our moms raised a good generation… they both passed on baba and dede’s wisdom. We’ve done the same with our kids, to the best of our ability. Let’s face it, a lot of ‘em turned out RIGHT… that’s why there’s still an Orthodox Church here. The Monomuckos brats are going to find out what goading a bear leads to… Cookie the Bookie is takin’ bets on how long it’ll take the real people to chase out the phonies… there’s no doubt on the outcome.

The Monomuckos crowd winks at child abuse… therefore, they have no cred. By the way, three of the OCA bishops do “get it” in re child abuse… Tikhon Mollard, Mel Pleska, and Alexander Golitzyn. Ergo, they’re the only three fit for the white hat. I talked with a Serbian priest friend of mine… I asked him if it was true that the Patriarchate of Serbia has a rule that no bishop can be patriarch until he’s been a ruling bishop for at least five years. He said, yes, indeed, I’d gotten it correct. This is a good rule, and it comes from one of the established Local Churches… therefore, there are only TWO fit candidates for the white hat… Tikhon Mollard and Mel Pleska. Neither has any scandal attaching to them, and I’m told that both of them oppose the kid-glove treatment that abusers and the corrupt have enjoyed for the past 40-odd years.

I’d say discount anything you hear from Monomuckos… if there’s anything worse than child abusers, it’s the greasy shitbirds who support them and allow them to continue. Fathausen is, indeed, that… his dalliance with Podmoshensky makes him unfit to run a doghouse, let alone a monastery or archdiocese. Simply look about you and notice who’s supporting such, and oppose them. “Dialogue” is useless at this point. To all of the drivellers at Monomuckos, I say, “I’ll see ya on the other side of the barricades. And, no… you shall not pass”.

Barbara-Marie Drezhlo

Tuesday 23 October 2012

Albany NY

 

Next Page »

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 502 other followers