Voices from Russia

Thursday, 1 March 2012

1 March 2012. Things Do Get Curiouser and Curiouser Department

______________________________

A well-connected individual sent me the following:

The Metropolitan suspended him right after he sued them.  However, [Velencia] refused to pick up the certified letter.  I think it was finally sent to his lawyer.

If this is so, then, why hasn’t the OCA PUBLICISED the suspension of Raymond Velencia OFFICIALLY and FORMALLY with a prominent post on its official website? Trust me, the slothfulness and laggardliness of this has led to nothing but SCANDAL, and during the first week of Lent, at that. It’s led to a legal summons sent to a priest by another priest during one of the holiest times of the Church Year. THAT would’ve been unthinkable in Vladyki Leonty’s time! Nevertheless, if this intel is true, and I rate it as highly probable due to the source, I think that the Federal court would LOVE to hear about it! Oh, well… it sure isn’t boring, is it? Oh, yes… another kitchen cabinet member thinks that this is a rather unsubtle ploy to get the OCA to vacate the suspension (it hasn’t been publicised, after all). I’m no mind reader or Kreskin, mind you, but that deduction does make good sense and it fits the character of the principal, doesn’t it?

Just when you thought that you’d seen it all…

Barbara-Marie Drezhlo

Thursday 1 March 2012

Albany NY 

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

29 February 2012. BREAKING NEWS! Velencia Surfaces! He’s STILL Suing Me, Cappy, Mel, Mark, and Fr Mike!

______________________________

I just received a “Request for Waiver of Service of Summons” from Velencia’s lawyer, Needle. Velencia is identified as “Father” Raymond Velencia, thus the summons implied that he’s a clergyman in good standing in the OCA. Therefore, I checked the clergy directory on oca.org. He wasn’t in the listing for the Archdiocese of Washington… he wasn’t in the listing for the state of Maryland… he wasn’t in the listing under “V”. Ergo, a reasonable person would conclude that Mr Velencia isn’t a clergyman in good standing in the OCA, so to represent himself as “Father” is disingenuous and misleading. If he IS a clergyman in full good standing in the OCA, then, they should put him back on their clergy listing. This is what happens when news isn’t properly reported or when clergy disciplinary matters aren’t posted promptly. If Mr Velencia was suspended, as rumour has it, and as the removal of his name from the clergy list implies, then, this legal matter should’ve been dead and buried.

It’s time for the OCA Holy Synod to act. Mr Velencia is still suing Michael Regan, who IS a clergyman in good standing in the OCA (and there’s no doubt on that score). There are three things that the OCA Holy Synod can do:

  • Reinstate Raymond Velencia on the OCA clergy list PUBLICLY and with due publication, and endorse his lawsuit against Fr Michael
  • Formally take disciplinary action against Raymond Velencia PUBLICLY and with due publication, and repudiate his lawsuit against Fr Michael
  • Dither and do nothing

As of 13.20 EST Wednesday 29 February 2012, Raymond Velencia’s name was NOT on the OCA clergy listing, ergo, his claim to the title “Father” is open to question. What alternative shall the OCA Holy Synod take? I haven’t the foggiest notion what they’ll do. I’ll say this, whatever was done earlier didn’t stop Mr Velencia from continuing his suit against Fr Michael. I’d say that stronger action IS called for…

Quo Vadis?

Barbara-Marie Drezhlo

Wednesday 29 February 2012

Albany NY

Who Woulda Thunk It Department:

I just looked at the legal papers again, and there was a slight error in my address (the mail-man gave it to me because he knows me personally)! I’m also informed that the address of another defendant was goofed up, too. This shows sloppy work… probably not from the lawyer, either… he only put down what his client told him. I have my suspicions as to who told Ray my address… and I’d tell the OCA Holy Synod that there’s more than one “loose cannon” amongst the clergy. Remember, “The records simply don’t exist” (that’s what a defender of a certain crook clergyman said)…

BMD 

Friday, 27 January 2012

BIG NEWS! Velencia Files Frivolous Law Suit in Howard County Maryland

______________________________

I received information that Raymond Velencia, Fathausen’s pal in Maryland, filed suit, supposedly on 24 January 2012, in Howard County MD against:

  • me
  • Melanie Sakoda
  • Cappy Larson
  • Mark Stokoe
  • Fr Michael Reagan
  • Fr John Jillions

(CORRECTION: A source told me that Jillions isn’t a party to the suit… but that he’s been informed of it… BMD)

Click here to see details on this weird shit. If you needed proof that the OCA hierarchy is living in Cloud Cuckoo Land, this is it. I’ve received no official notice on this yet. However, I’d advise the OCA Holy Synod to act immediately. This crazy loon has Fathausen’s full support. Ergo, the Holy Synod has to meet in emergency session to depose Ray Velencia and to depose Fathausen for encouraging this looney shit. Let’s not be coy… the Winnipeg magistrate is watching this! If the Holy Synod doesn’t slap these two crazy maniacs down IMMEDIATELY, Judge Pollack in Winnipeg is going to come to conclusions about the OCA’s truthfulness. He’ll conclude that the OCA is an out-of-control organisation. Look, he already offered Storheim a plea… the Court does that if it’s got the evidence to convict. Usually, in cases like this, the court trades a guilty plea for a suspended sentence. I’ll bet you that Fathausen told Storheim to refuse it… and that they’d beat the rap… I wouldn’t bet against it.

Note this well… Storheim refused this plea… and Velencia filed this looney suit. They’re NOT unconnected, I believe. Fathausen is behind both of these oddbod decisions, I’m sure. A sane organisation would trade Storheim’s guilty plea for peace. A sane organisation would depose a loose cannon like Velencia.

I’d tell the Centre, “What more do you need? Step in, revoke the Tomos immediately, or more damage will be done”. What did we all do to deserve such shit?

Barbara-Marie Drezhlo

Friday 27 January 2012

Albany NY

Thursday, 27 October 2011

Why Does Paffhausen Keep Velencia in Limbo?

I’ve been discussing this matter with friends. I’ve decided NOT to quote them (for that would offer clues to their identity), but I think that the themes we touched upon are of general interest to you.

It’s completely baffling why JP keeps Velencia in a state of limbo. Frankly, the only conceivable explanation is that he “knows too much”… and JP doesn’t have the stones to drop him off a bridge to “swim with the fishies” (figuratively, of course). The present impasse is unfair to Velencia’s family and it’s harmful to the Church; it violates Christ’s command to His Church to be the salt of the earth (it’s not supposed to be the arsenic). This non-solution only prolongs the agony; this continued limbo serves no one. It’s better to can him and pension him off than it is to see him back in any position of pastoral responsibility (no matter what archdiocese). If it were up to me, that’s what I’d do. Good riddance to bad rubbish… it’d be money well-spent.

Velencia’s only a SYMPTOM. He’s a problem because Paffhausen REFUSES to do anything about the situation. My guess is that Velencia knows something about JP’s Platina connection with Podmoshensky (GP). Don’t forget… JP maintained a guru-disciple relationship with GP even after GP’s deposition by the ROCOR Holy Synod (JP knew full well about GP’s tastes and ROCOR’s deposition of GP). It’s something that JP keeps well under wraps… it’s one of the possibilities out there. Note the uncaring and self-centred cruelty in JP’s position… he frankly doesn’t care about his allies’ interests (or actual needs… they’re nothing but a means to an end for JP). THAT may bring him down in the end…

If we remove Paffhausen… Velencia falls. Velencia will fight for JP until the end. Watch for Ray & Co to be part of Fathausen’s Last Stand Old Guard (“Merde! The Guard dies! It does NOT surrender!”). It’s NEVER boring in Orthodoxy in the American diaspora.

Barbara-Marie Drezhlo

Thursday 27 October 2011

Albany NY

Wednesday, 26 October 2011

26 October 2011. If Not Me and You… Then, Who? Why the Sobor has to ACT Against Paffhausen, Velencia, and Lyonyo…

If Not Me and You… Then, Who?

Lyudmila Tarasova

1987

______________________________

The threat I received on Monday from Velencia’s lawyer should be a cause for reflection for all of us. For many years, the SVS crowd hasn’t been averse to using threats, character assassination, and deprivation of the mysteries against its enemies. Bishop Job Osacky said so, and he put it in writing. Do ask John and Monica Iliff how SVS blackened their son’s reputation. Do ask Cappy Larson and Melanie Sakoda about the number of threatening letters that they’ve received from lawyers for posting the truth (do note that none of the threats materialised). That is, Howard Needle’s letter was nothing new for the SVS/Syosset cabal. Let’s remember what Archbishop Job wrote:

The first person says, “You do not agree with me. That means you are not with me. That means you don’t like me. That means you are against me. That means you’re out to get me. That means you are attacking me. That means I have to destroy you”.

The second person should reply, “No, it means I don’t agree with you. That’s all. Let’s have a cup of coffee and discuss it, and maybe you’ll convince me, or, at least, we might be able to reach some compromise”.

But, my friends, our reality has shown that the exchange would not take place. The second person would never have been given the opportunity to respond, and the attack by the first person, with the motive of character assassination would begin. And, my sisters and brothers, there would be no opportunity for discussion, for dialogue, or for compromise. This scenario was repeated again and again, and continues today, and has become the basis for promoting personal agendas and lusting after power and authority. Is this noble; is it righteous; is it Christian? Can it ever be justifiable as being “for the good of the Church?” God forbid! And may He help us all, because this is how we’ve been operating in the Holy Synod and Central Church Administration for years, and we are slow to adopt an alternative.

Archbishop Job Osacky of Chicago and the Midwest (OCA)

(1946-2009)

http://midwestdiocese.org/news_071004_1.html

******

Vladyki Job ht the nail on the head when he said, “Is this noble; is it righteous; is it Christian? Can it ever be justifiable as being ‘for the good of the Church?’ God forbid! And may He help us all, because this is how we’ve been operating in the Holy Synod and Central Church Administration for years, and we are slow to adopt an alternative”. That describes Velencia’s actions to a tee. I’d ask myself, “Has he threatened other people?” The Sobor should question this loathsome SOB… and they should defrock him for threatening the faithful… I, for one, would be willing to give evidence against him (both in Church and judicial venues). Trust me, I’d not be the only one to come forward… I’m willing to bet on it (taking this creepo supremo’s past actions into account). This shit has to stop and the Church can do it. Defrock Velencia… depose Paffhausen… fire Lyonyo and Jillions… that’d be a good start. We have to honour Vladyki’s memory by heeding his words. “Can it ever be justifiable as being ‘for the good of the Church’?” It isn’t… it’s time to clean house. It’s not going to be easy or painless, but we must do it. Velencia threw down a gauntlet in front of the Sobor… “I have the right to threaten people as I please”. It’s time to pick up Bishop Job’s mantle. Bishop Mel, you should say, “NO… you shall NOT threaten anyone, Mr Velencia… and you’re toast as a priest because of it”. If you do that, sir… it would lance a good deal of the infection that’s there.

Shall you do it? If not me and you… then, who?

Barbara-Marie Drezhlo

Wednesday 26 October 2011

Albany NY

Saturday, 24 September 2011

24 September 2011. Interesting Intel about a Disgraced OCA Priest I Got From Some Greek Informants…

Archbishop Melchisedek Pleska (1942- ) and Patriarch Kirill Gundyaev (1946- ) flank JP in Moscow… I somehow think that they’re not happy with JP at all… keep this image in mind as you read what’s below…

__________________________________

Earlier today, I wrote about Raymond Velencia, a disgraced OCA priest who has the brass to air a parishioner’s private affairs in front of the whole OCA Metropolitan Council. I noted that he was still on the OCA clergy list, attached to St Nicholas Cathedral in DC, despite all the news that he’d gone over to the Greeks. Well, some of my Greek confrères were happy to clue me in on the straight story on the matter.

Even though he’s still officially attached to St Nick’s in the District, my contacts swear that he’s never set foot in the place and he’s cosied up to his pals in the GOAA, hoping they’d take him in. My sources tell me that Garklavs put out the word, right after Velencia’s removal from his parish, that not only did JP deny Velencia’s request for a release, but that the GOAA told Ray that they wouldn’t take him, even if he did get a release. Apparently, he gadded around GOAA parishes in the Bawlmor area assisting and filling in, mainly at Annunciation and St Demetrios. During the summer, when he was allowed to work at that GOAA kids camp, a camp counsellor reported that Velencia was shadowed by Fr Manny Burdisi, and that Velencia, along with his stooge and former assistant Duane Johnson, was assisting at a miniscule parish, Ss Mary Magdalene and Markella in Cecil County, which is over an hour’s drive one-way from Velencia and Johnson’s home base in Columbia. Some tell me that they no longer allow him to assist at Annunciation, although that’s a large parish in downtown Balto with only one priest.

JP is allowing “spoilt goods” to circulate amongst the faithful. To put it bluntly, Velencia’s a contumacious criminal who broke the law. Pastoral confidentiality is a LEGAL concept, not a canonical one, ergo, the secular courts have jurisdiction in such matters. Don’t forget, as civil secular government didn’t break down in the provinces of the Empire that didn’t fall to the Western barbarians, the Church understands that some things are in its purview… others are the state’s responsibility. That’s what symphonia is all about, kids. If a priest breaks the secular law, the Church has no problem with handing him over to the secular authorities for judgement and sentencing. As a result, the Church could depose a priest for shaming Christ’s Church and Priesthood by breaking the civil law… indeed, it should. Shame on Paffhausen and all who support him, they allowed this criminal priest to continue to serve. JP had the duty to defrock Velencia. Full stop. JP had to see to it that Ray harmed no more people. He refused to do his duty… just as the OCA Holy Synod refused to do its duty in the case of Benjamin Peterson. I know of no Local Church or any other church body that’s allowed a bishop to serve after a DUI arrest. Indeed, the EKD deep-sixed its leading bishop, Margot Kässmann, because the coppers nicked her for DUI.

If JP can’t protect the people from a ravening priest, he’s got to go. As one of my Greek friends put it, “We’d be brain-dead to accept someone like that. As soon as they heard about it in 79th Street {GOAA HQ: editor} they’d send the guys down here a message telling ‘em to knock off the monkey business”. JP’s secrecy is unbecoming of an Orthodox bishop. JP has to go for not doing his duty vis-à-vis Ray Velencia. If I’ve heard of Velencia serving outside of his archdiocese… so has Fathausen. Think on that. He KNOWS of this and he hasn’t stopped it. He smiles a drooling smirk of approval at this flagrant violation of the canons. If Ray wants to serve in the GOAA… let him get a release. However, he can’t get one, so, that means that he’s still an OCA cleric… which means that he’s JP’s headache. IT ALSO MEANS THAT RAY’S PRESENT SERVING IN GOAA PARISHES IS AN UNCANONICAL BREACH OF ORDER. I passed this to a priest friend, who informed me that, according to Hoyle, there has to be EXPLICIT permission from the bishop for “foreign” clergy to serve in a given diocese, even clergy from another diocese in the same archdiocese/metropolia. Ray Velencia is spitting on the good order and name of the Church… and JP does NOTHING. THAT should tell you something…

JP’s got to do what the ROCOR Holy Synod had to do in the end. Gleb Podmoshensky finally got le sabot from the ROCOR Holy Synod… they also acted in the case of Sam Greene’s band of merry men in Texas and Antony Grabbe in the Holy Land. All of these cases were embarrassing as all hell… it made the ROCOR bishops look like a bunch of schlemiels. Yet, they stepped up and did what they had to… these clerical poseurs were kicked out, deposed, or made redundant very rapidly. The OCA had to pay out an undisclosed settlement to Kristi Koumentakos (trust me, I know no more details of that than anyone else does)… that only happened because it was clear that Ray Velencia, acting as an agent for the OCA, breached pastoral confidentiality. They paid up rather than have an adverse verdict.

I don’t think that KMG would act in such a fashion. Look at the image at the head of the post again. Does it look like Mel and Nibs are happy with El Gordo? I leave it to your decision…

Barbara-Marie Drezhlo

Saturday 24 September 2011

Albany NY

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 538 other followers