Voices from Russia

Tuesday, 20 January 2009

The UOC/MP doesn’t Exclude the Nomination of Metropolitan Vladimir Sabodan to the Patriarchate

metropolitan-vladimir

Metropolitan Vladimir Sabodan of Kiev (1935- ), First Hierarch of the UOC/MP. The leader of the largest single delegation to the Local Council

______________________________

As indicated previously, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church/Moscow Patriarchate doesn’t preclude the nomination of Vladimir Metropolitan of Kiev to stand for the office of Patriarch of Moscow and all Russia for at election at the MP Local Council on 27-29 January. As reported at a press conference of the Synod of the UOC/MP, Archbishop Mitrofan, the head of the synodal commission arranging the participation of the dioceses of the UOC/MP in the upcoming Council, said that, at the present moment, the process of nominating Metropolitan Vladimir as a candidate in the patriarchal election hasn’t been completed, only the preliminary procedures have been done. In particular, Archbishop Mitrofan said that he’s ready to support the candidacy of Metropolitan Vladimir to the patriarchate, if the Metropolitan himself wishes to participate in the elections.

In turn, the head of the Department for External Church Relations of the UOC/MP, Archimandrite Kirill Govorun, called to mind that Metropolitan Vladimir recently expressed his reluctance to participate in the elections. However, according to Fr Kirill, “this doesn’t necessarily mean that, at the time of the Archpastoral Council, which will take place prior to the Local Council, such a proposal might not again arise. There’s no guarantee of this; therefore, it remains a formal possibility”. Fr Kirill went on to say that Metropolitan Vladimir will take a final decision whether to participate in the electoral process or to withdraw his name from nomination only at the time of the Archpastoral Council. Also, Archbishop Mitrofan reported that, today, all dioceses of the UOC/MP have held local assemblies to elect delegates to the MP Local Council. In total, the UOC/MP shall send 192 delegates to the Local Council number of participants of the Council. In this case, out of the total number of 711 voting members, the UOC/MP delegation will comprise almost a third of the Council.

20 January 2009

Interfax-Religion

http://www.interfax-religion.ru/?act=news&div=28371

Editor’s Note:

The UOC/MP bloc shall be the largest single conglomeration of delegates at the Local Council. There’s been no information, either official or unofficial, that gives any indication of where this group stands. However, this much can be said… I believe that the pivotal figure in this election shall be Metropolitan Vladimir Sabodan. Do recall that he was a candidate at the last patriarchal election in 1990. He may not run again due to advanced age and health problems, but that won’t stop him from acting as the éminence grise and the “kingmaker” at the Council. After all, he DOES have the votes…

BMD

“Doctor Zhivago” and the 1958 Nobel Prize: The CIA’s Secret Triumph

boris-pasternak

Boris Pasternak (1890-1960), novelist and poet, 1958 Nobel Prize laureate in literature for his novel Doctor Zhivago, author of the influential poetry collection My Sister Life (1917), which is considered the most important poetry anthology in Russian in the 20th century

Under the rules of the Swedish Academy, the archives of the Nobel Prize may be opened 50 years after the award takes place. Thus, the documents of October 1958 may be declassified in January of this year. This is a notable date for Russian culture. That year, the Academy awarded a Nobel Prize in literature to Soviet poet Boris Pasternak. Now that the archives have been declassified, the circumstances of the loudest scandal in the history of Nobel Prizes will be scrutinised, at last.

The story of the Pasternak award was crowned with quite a sensation. It transpired that the CIA made a contribution to the award. The CIA printed the first Russian edition of Doctor Zhivago, without which Pasternak’s nomination would not have been discussed, because the Nobel Committee only reviews fiction in the original. Needless to say, Pasternak himself had nothing to do with intelligence. His genius was simply used as a powerful weapon in the Cold War between the East and the West. Until recently, this detective story was couched in a thick veil of secrecy. It was solely owing to the persistence of philologist Ivan Tolstoy (from the famous Tolstoy family) that the secret was revealed and made public. It took him 20 years to resolve the enigma.

Boris Pasternak started writing his legendary novel soon after the end of World War II, in 1946. It took him ten years. Upon completing it in January 1956, Pasternak started to wonder what to do next. The novel that was eventually called Doctor Zhivago (the initial title was The Burning Candle) ran counter to the principles of Soviet literature. Should he just shelve it until better times? But, when will these better times come, if at all? Also, he was no longer young. Pasternak decided to try to get it published. He took the novel to the editorial office of the popular literary journal Novy Mir. At the same time, he gave a huge folder with its typed version to the young Italian journalist Sergio D’Angelo. A Moscow radio broadcaster, the Italian was looking for new Soviet novels for Giangiacomo Feltrinelli, a Milan-based ambitious young Italian publisher with communist views. Having found out about the new novel, the Italian journalist rushed to Peredelkino, outside Moscow, where the writer lived, and Pasternak handed it to him without any hesitation.

Having learned about this, Pasternak’s wife Zinaida almost burst into tears. She had no illusions about the consequences… arrest, a labour camp, separation. The poet was trying to put a good face on the matter, and reassured his family but felt that the clouds were gathering over him. Nonetheless, he decided to go to the end and gave two more typed copies to another two foreign visitors, British essayist and philosopher Isaiah Berlin, and French specialist in Slavic Studies Helene Peltier. At this point, secrecy cast its first shadow on the story. The CIA found out about Pasternak’s novel. Its Russian section understood full well what political benefits could stem from the publication of a novel which was bound to be banned at home. It only remained to get the text. Here comes the most mysterious episode of the story. The aircraft carrying a passenger with a copy of the novel was ordered to land in the airport of Malta in the Mediterranean. The pilot apologised for the stopover. The annoyed passengers went to the airport’s departure lounge, while CIA agents found the right suitcase, took out the text, and photographed it page by page. They put the text back into the suitcase, and two hours later the aircraft was airborne again. The passengers arrived at their destination. The owner of the suitcase was in blissful ignorance of what had happened with it.

Approximately at the same time, the KGB found out that Pasternak’s novel had been taken abroad. The events began snowballing into an avalanche. The journal Novy Mir rejected the novel, and reprimanded the poet for the inadmissible text; the KGB and the Soviet Communist Party Central Committee exerted pressure on the publisher from Milan through the Italian Communist Party, but Feltrinelli published the novel and demonstratively quit the party. On 23 November 1957, the novel appeared in print in Italian and exceeded all expectations. Its first edition of 12,000 copies was sold out in a matter of days. More copies were printed every two weeks, but, the boom did not subside. It became world famous, and was translated into English, German, and French. In the spring of 1958, Albert Camus nominated Pasternak for a Nobel Prize.

However, under the Nobel Committee’s rules, the novel had to be read in the original. Here, the CIA-copied version came in handy. Every hour counted in what was a now-or-never situation. Through proxy funds, the CIA gave money to urgently publish the novel in Russian. To cover up the traces of stealing, the CIA made galleys from the photocopies and printed the Russian version in the academic publishing house of Muton in The Hague without any copyrights in August 1958. The Swedish Academy had no more obstacles for awarding Pasternak, and on 23 October 1958 the Nobel cannon shot at the Soviet government. Pasternak received a Nobel Prize for outstanding merits in modern lyric poetry and for continuing the traditions of the great Russian novel.

Pasternak sent a cable in reply, “Immensely thankful, touched, proud, astonished, abashed”. He naïvely hoped to go to Stockholm and receive his Nobel Prize from the hands of the Swedish King, but, the authorities twisted the arms of the woman he loved, Olga Ivinskaya. Stunned by such consequences and gripped with fear for his beloved, Pasternak turned down the Nobel Prize, and sent a relevant cable to Stockholm. The CIA operation was a success. The Soviet Union received a tangible blow. The Pasternak story revealed the shattering power of anti-Soviet literature in the West. Pasternak paved the way to a whole series of anti-Soviet publications which were crowned with the sensational Gulag Archipelago, for which the dissident Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was also awarded a Nobel Prize.

19 January 2009

Anatoly Korolev

RIA-Novosti

http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20090119/119705315.html

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.