Whilst we were motoring on this lovely autumn afternoon, Nicky and I were discussing the lunacy surrounding Paffhausen’s little visit to Nashotah House. He said, “It sounds like he’s homesick for his childhood… it sounds like he wants to return to the Episcopal Church”. Bravo! That’s what it appears to be to any person of good-sense. Of course, the pseudo-intellectuals at SVS don’t see it, nor do the immature recent konvertsy (especially those who came in from the Episcopalians). However… I would wager that most ordinary Orthodox can see that, it’s rather plain to see, actually.
Firstly, I have nothing against the folks at Nashotah House as human-beings. I don’t know them, so, of course, as I’m a Christian (that is, I do my best to practise what I profess), I give others the benefit of the doubt. Trust me, if I were to meet any of them, I’d be civil and polite, for that’s how my parents brought me up. There’s no question in my mind that a pleasant time could be had by all. However… I would NEVER bring up the topics of ecumenism or Anglican-Orthodox relations. If they were broached, I’d politely (but firmly) steer the conversation away from such subjects. I’d not wish there to be any disagreeable moments, nor would I desire to see a “scene”. After all, aren’t kindness and understanding good things? Yet, this does NOT mean that I favour having a pointless and fruitless “dialogue”.
Anglicans are outside the Church. Full stop. That is, we Orthodox believe that they are outside of the Visible Body of Christ. Their theology and practise are deficient on countless points. THEY AREN’T ORTHODOX, NOR CAN THEY BE UNTIL THEY ABANDON THEIR HERESY. Until that time, no Orthodox institution can be “yoked unequally” with any Anglican institution in any way, shape, or form, for all that does is to encourage Anglicans in their heterodoxy. Do you wish to be in union with us? Fine… abandon your heresy. Does this bald statement distress you? Whether it does or not, such IS our position. It’s much better that we be frank and honest in our dealings with one another. There shall be MUCH less misunderstanding and disappointment in our future relations if we do so, I believe.
To speak bluntly, the agreement with Nashotah House penned by Messrs Hatfield and Paffhausen was disingenuous and mischievous in the extreme, and we must abrogate it directly and utterly. Otherwise, it’s an open profession of unity with heterodox… whether one finds them pleasant and agreeable on a human level is irrelevant… one can’t be in union with those who aren’t fully in concord in the Faith with us.
If this agreement isn’t declared null and void in the shortest possible order, one can only come to one conclusion. Messrs Paffhausen and Hatfield (and most probably others as well) place the achievement of a false union with Anglicanism above faithfulness to the Church. What’s amazing about this situation is that the “Orthodox” protagonists are two men who supposedly “converted” from Anglicanism years ago. I know of no other case where people sucked up to their former confession so openly, blatantly, and shamelessly. Usually, one can’t get converts to sit in the same room as those as those of their former confession. As Alice said, “Things are getting curiouser and curiouser”. Indeed… is the Jabberwocky lurking around the corner? I now know what Mr Scrooge meant when he said, “If that’s so, I’ll check myself into Bedlam”.
I have a question for all former Anglicans in Orthodoxy… “Do you believe the Orthodox conception of the Church or do you still believe in the Anglican spirit of compromise and comprehensiveness?” Don’t answer this immediately… give it some thought over some weeks… the answer shall tell you whether you are truly Orthodox or truly Anglican. If it should prove the latter… I, for one, wouldn’t condemn you. Go to where your heart truly is. In the end, to remain in a place where you are being untrue to yourself is to be untrue to God.
It’s better to be still on the road and to be honest about it than to declare the journey over when you’ve hardly started. It’s hard, isn’t it? Know that I, for one, understand this dilemma. It’s not easy being green…
QUO VADIS?
Barbara-Marie Drezhlo
Sunday 11 October 2009
Albany NY
You must be logged in to post a comment.