
Read this:
http://www.oca.org/news/2380
They’re serious… they truly are serious. Note well that Slacker Matusiak is still in charge. Firstly, these folks aren’t fulltimers. The OCA lacks the funds, full stop. I’ll bet ya that they’re all FOPs (Friends of Paffhausen). Well, the OCA site is “well-trafficked”… let’s look at some objective figures for “people” (not “visits”, not “page-views”, not “cookies”). This is the best way of determining “readership”… Andrei Psaryov was boasting that he had 21,000 “readers”, when all that he had was 21,000 “visits”… quite a different creature (he has a monthly readership of less than 2,000 per Quantcast figures).
Paffhausen, Tosi, Matusiak, et al are NEVER going to give you objective third-party figures… do you remember Tosi’s bleat, “The records simply don’t exist?” (I still ask the question, “Would he say that to a judge… or would the records ‘magically’ reappear?”) I do daresay that I don’t find such a person trustworthy, and I don’t think that you do, either. Have no fear; I’ll give you the graphs, so that you can toss the figures against the wall, so that you can see how they splash, and so that you can rake through it all to come to a reasonable conclusion.
These figures cover the last 12-month period. They cover this website, the OCA official site (oca.org), Stokoe’s site (ocanews.org), and the ROCOR official website. Here goes nothing…
______________________________
A. Monthly Readership

******

******

******

______________________________
B. Weekly Readership

******

******

******

______________________________
C. Daily Readership

******

******

******

______________________________
In terms of monthly readership, it breaks down as follows (I’m told that the estimates are totals, so the figures are fungible and compatible):
- Voices from Russia: 21,400
- OCA: 18,800
- Stokoe: 14,200
- ROCOR: 12,400
This is the total monthly readership, we can call this figure “100”… weekly and daily figures aren’t cumulative. Here’s the weekly readership:
- Voices from Russia: 7,200 (33.6)
- Stokoe: 7,200 (50.7)
- OCA: 6,600 (35.1)
- ROCOR: 3,700 (29.8)
The lower the percentage figure is, the less preaching to the choir is going on, so, if we go by percentage, the ranks change:
- Stokoe: 50.7
- OCA: 35.1
- Voices from Russia: 33.6
- ROCOR: 29.8
Look at the LOW ROCOR number… it means that it’s the site with the most potential for growth. The overly high Stokoe figure means that its audience is probably static and inbred. NOT good news for them.
Now, let’s go to the daily figures… there are two percentages, one as compared to the monthly sum, and the other compared to the weekly total.
- Stokoe: 6,600 (45.8/91.7)
- OCA: 5,100 (27.1/77.3)
- Voices from Russia: 1,100 (5.1/15.3)
- ROCOR: 779 (6.3/21.1)
Again, let’s rank by percentage, first by day compared to month:
- Stokoe: 45.8
- OCA: 27.1
- ROCOR: 6.3
- Voices from Russia: 5.1
The lower the number, the higher the growth potential. Stokoe is stuck in the mud… the OCA is sucking wind… both the ROCOR site and mine have good potential for growth.
Now, let’s compare daily runs with the weekly total:
- Stokoe: 91.7
- OCA: 77.3
- ROCOR: 21.1
- Voices from Russia: 15.3
These only nail down the previous trends even more tightly. Stokoe’s weekly and daily figures are nearly at identity… that’s BAD. The OCA figures, aren’t much better… both these sites are sclerotic and reaching only a restricted coterie. My site is designedly eclectic… but, who would’ve thunk it, the ROCOR site is drawing just as well.
This gives ya the REAL DEAL on the websites. Both Stokoe’s site and oca.org are busted-down nags only fit for the glue factory. Wanna know where to put your money? Cookie the Bookie sez, “Vara to win, and the Russkies to place… the other two? Save ya money”. In short, GIGO from Matusiak, yet again. “When will they ever learn?” I think that my horse ate their flowers… that’s where they went!
Barbara-Marie Drezhlo
Monday 17 January 2011
Albany NY
You must be logged in to post a comment.