Voices from Russia

Tuesday, 7 March 2017

Tom Perez: Is It Wise to Continue the Clintons’ Legacy?


Many see the new Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez as a continuation of the Clintons’ political legacy, but concerns have arisen that the party needs to urgently chart a new course. The long-time Democratic insider and high-ranking member of the party élite was most recently Obama’s Secretary of Labour, prior to which some considered him as a possible running mate for Hillary Clinton. Perez earlier served under Bill Clinton’s government as a civil rights attorney, so he has extensive experience in government, but in today’s era, this also makes him the epitome of the “establishment”, which some observers say is the last thing that the Democrats need to be associated with nowadays. However, many painted Perez’s DNC rival Keith Ellison by many as being a “political insurgent” of the Sanders brand, and commentators compared the Perez-Ellison DNC race to a re-run of the Clinton-Sanders primary last year.

Both candidates rejected this comparison as a media-driven story, and Perez was quick to signal party unity by immediately appointing Ellison as deputy chairman of the party right after his narrow victory in the second round of voting. However, this didn’t stop the criticism coming in from some of Sanders’ supporters, who felt that the party had made a major mistake by continuing with the Clinton political legacy and forcing their faction to play second fiddle yet again. Even Trump got involved in the social media trash-talking by tweeting:

The race for DNC Chairman was, of course, totally “rigged”. Bernie’s guy, like Bernie himself, never had a chance. Clinton demanded Perez!

This seemingly channelled what many Sanders supporters were feeling was another unfortunate case of déjà vu. The President continued with his taunts by later tweeting:

Congratulations to Thomas Perez, who has just been named Chairman of the DNC. I could not be happier for him, or for the Republican Party!

It’s obvious that Trump has a political agenda in what he says, but he does hint at a more objective point about whether it wise or not for the Democrats to continue with Hilary’s failed political legacy by picking her surrogate as the party’s next leader instead of embracing the change that its most enthusiastic supporters hoped would radically breathe new life into the stale party.

4 March 2017

Andrew Korybko

Sputnik International


Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: