Voices from Russia

Tuesday, 21 April 2015

Pushilin Demands that Minsk Guarantors Force the Ukraine to Carry Out the Minsk Accords

00 denis pushilin. donetsk peoples reprublic. russia. 20.05.14


The DNR Official Representative of the Contact Group, D V Pushilin, the Vice-Chairman of the DNR Peoples Soviet, said that the statement by the Ukrainian Presidential Administration on the possible introduction of UN peacekeepers in Novorossiya indicated an unwillingness to carry out the Minsk Agreement, noting, “Unfortunately, the Ukraine ceased to be a guarantor of the Minsk-2 pact by its active attempts to push at the UN their idea of ​​deploying foreign peacekeepers in the Donbass. Poroshenko couldn’t have been unaware that paragraph 10 of the Set-Up provides for the withdrawal of any and all foreign armed groups from the Donbass. Of all the international organisations, the package only mentioned the OSCE’s role, which has the task of monitoring [the pact’s execution], so, by his initiative, Poroshenko actually discredits the Observer Mission. Once again, this proves that the Ukraine tries to derail the implementation of the Minsk agreements. Kiev consistently alleges that the OSCE is unable to carry out the prescribed in these agreements”.

Therefore, once again, the DNR calls on the leaders of Germany and France, which together with Russian President V V Putin, were the guarantors of the package of measures, to prevent any further provocative moves on the part of Kiev. Pushilin observed, “Bundeskanzlerin Merkel and Président Hollande declared that they’d guarantee that the Ukraine would carry out Minsk-2. Therefore, they now have to bring Poroshenko to heel, as by his actions, he ripped up the Minsk agreements”. Pushilin said that the initiative to deploy peacekeepers in Novorossiya, which Poroshenko allegedly discussed with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, is unlikely to see implementation, as Kiev can’t rely on an international consensus that such a move is necessary. He concluded, “I think that there are UN member-countries that won’t agree with Poroshenko’s initiative”.

In the early morning hours of 21 April, Poroshenko’s media flacks said that he held talks with the UN Secretary General. The parties allegedly “agreed to implement further steps for the possible deployment of peacekeeping contingent under the auspices of the UN in the Donbas”. There is no UN statement on the subject.

21 April 2015

DAN Donetsk News Agency



Let’s keep it short. Any deployment of peacekeepers would have to pass the Security Council. Both Russia and China are permanent members and have vetoes… do you need to be Einstein to see how this Mexican soap opera is going to turn out? Poroshenko is in a crisis and he’s grasping at anything. The only thing that people are betting on is when the misbegotten Ukraine goes under. No one believes that it can stand. Not even those writing pro-Ukrainian articles in the Western media believe that it can stand (except for a few deluded Galician Uniate nationalists). The so-called “Ukraine” ain’t dead yet… but it soon shall be… and the world will be better off without it. Good riddance to bad rubbish…


Tuesday, 31 March 2015

Plotnitsky Sez LNR Not Concerned Over Lack of UN Humanitarian Aid… Thanks Putin for Aid in Face of Junta Economic Embargo

00 Feed the Hungry in Donetsk. 03.03.15


Today, Chairman of the LNR Government I V Plotnitsky said at a media briefing in Lugansk that a lack of UN humanitarian aid to Novorossiya wouldn’t harm the LNR. Earlier, the UN stated that it couldn’t send food aid to the DNR and LNR due to a serious lack of funding. According to a report of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, it only received only 16 percent of the 316 million USD (18.4 billion Roubles. 1.96 billion Renminbi. 19.7 billion INR. 400.5 million CAD. 414.8 million AUD. 294.1 million Euros. 212.8 million UK Pounds) requested to help Novorossiya residents. Plotnitsky commented, “We aren’t surprised by such a statement. Compared with the volume of humanitarian aid from the Russian Federation, UN humanitarian aid was just a trickle. Our [Russian] brothers didn’t leave us in the lurch to face the economic blockade ginned up against us by the Ukraine and its allies. Today, thanks to the Russian Federation in general and to V V Putin in particular, we have all the necessities that we require. Fact is, the UN didn’t give us much, and it didn’t affect much. We thank them for their help, but we can fend for ourselves”.

31 March 2015

LITs Lugansk Information Centre


Friday, 27 March 2015

27 March 2015. Our People Die… Anglo America Laughs

00 novorossiya. refugee. 27.03.15.png-large


Read this from Novorossiya, as attested by the UN:

Aleksandra Leonova is 91 and remembers World War II. She said, “I was 18 when World War II broke out, but this is worse because I have lost everything. Everything was destroyed”’

UN Refugee Agency


This is what the Galician Uniate nationalist filth do. “A Knife for the Moskals!” “The Ukraine for Ukrainians Only!” This is what that means. If you support the Ukrainian junta, you support unrequited evil, full stop. Even though most of the “Ukrainian” people don’t’ support the war and refuse to take part in it, there are enough Galician Uniate nationalist fanatics to create mayhem. They killed thousands in the VOV at the Nazis’ behest. They killed thousands in the immediate postwar period at the CIA’s behest. They killed thousands after 1991, at the CIA’s behest. They kill thousands today, at the CIA’s behest. I’ve seen both “Ukrainian Catholics” and “Ukrainian Orthodox” up close and personal. The official bodies do turn a blind eye (at best) to indoctrination in hate… I’ve seen it personally. Literally, they hate “Moskals” and will do anything to hurt us. Do not return hate with hate. Be prudent, keep your eyes open, oppose their lies with the truth… but don’t hate. The Uniate nationalists have made a Faustian bargain… let’s not do the same.

Don’t have anything to do with “Ukrainian Orthodox” or “Ukrainian Catholic” bodies or associations. They hate and kill our coreligionists. At the very least, don’t fraternise with the enemies of our Narod and Faith. Evil is what it is… distressingly banal… yet, still evil. God preserve us all.



Tuesday, 24 March 2015

NATO Marches Towards Russia, but They Have No Idea What Awaits Them

00 thank god wer're russians. 24.03.15


America is fully aware that the way to draw Russia into a conflict is to push forward towards Russia’s borders. In time, that’d force Russia to defend its right to exist, and if that happened, the Western powers wouldn’t know what hit them. American politicians in particular and European politicians in general are some of the most ignorant fools when the issue comes to anything outside their own borders. When it comes to Russia, it’s an enigma wrapped in a mystery… but only because, dear readers, no one ever bothered to try to understand Russians and the Russian worldview.

One important historical fact about Russia is that Russia is a unique civilisational bloc built upon defence, not offence. Historically, what this means is that Russia doesn’t start wars, or a series of wars (although it may strike first in a confrontation punctuated by a series of wars). In Russian history, Russian leaders since Russia’s baptism to Orthodoxy tried hard to avoid war with our neighbours, although just about every time this failed. In parallel, as much as we don’t like war, and Orthodoxy considers killing in combat a sin (we don’t have the Just War heresy), we’re very, very ,good at killing and destroying. A paradox, but its reality. This was so profound that in the summer of 1914, Tsar Nikolai II Aleksandrovich, when war was imminent, even halted mobilisation to try to defuse the situation one more time and talk the Austrians and Germans out of what would become the great tragedy of the early 20th century. The problems with modern, and in truth historical, Western politicos is that these guys are absolute fools with no understanding of the Russian psyche and are sure to cause World War 3, be it intentional or accidental. They’re projecting their psyche onto Russians. What this means is that they project their typical negative reinforcement mentality. Europe and the USA are societies built on constant aggression towards neighbours. They stave off aggression by building up a credible large counterforce of allies and blocs, which causes fear of defeat and de-escalation… your typical European balance of power approach.

Russia is a defensive empire, that is, Russians didn’t start most wars or series of wars, but enemies attacking or massing on Russia’s borders did so. After 800 years of almost nonstop aggression by Europeans, Russia doesn’t tolerate any enemy massing on her borders in what appears as a preparation for invasion or for foreigners creating large-scale basing areas, like an American US neocon-dominated Ukraine. Besides this, one notes the Russian policy of not abandoning Russians (ethnic or cultural) and allies, as opposed to Anglo society, where backstabbing allies when an opportunity to profit exists is a prized skill. As such, this is a spiral approach. Any escalation by foreigners would lead to a direct escalation by Russia and not de-escalation. Balance of power doesn’t work when Russia feels her survival threatened. Enough of an enemy escalation in the hope of forcing Russia to back off would generate the exact opposite effect in generating a first strike and total war, if Russia felt her life and existence threatened by an enemy.

Nothing can put Russian society into a siege mentality, to force the individual chaotic Russian nature to crystallise into one direction, like an effort to destroy a threat, to destroy any state that generates it. Russia’s army may be only 1 million, but the ready reserve is over 20 million with a follow capability of total mobilisation of over 40 more million, and maybe more if one starts counting female combatants and one should. Last time, children, old people, and women ran the factories. Now, with massive automation, even more of society is free to fight. Since Russian civilisation isn’t just land, but also a cultural ideology/philosophy, it generates absolute fanatical loyalty. This is a loyalty to a culture that allows the temporary surrender of land for time in the understanding that this would then be used, combined with nonstop partisan warfare, to grind down the invader and decimate him deep in the Russian interior, before marching on his cities and burning them to the ground in revenge.

Europe needs to find some German or Romanian veterans and ask them how much fun they had. Mamayev Kurgan, the highest hill in Volgograd (Stalingrad), a 1.5 square-kilometre area, had 35,000 identifiable bodies on it, half of them German, after 4 months of fighting. That’s more than both sides lost on the beaches of Normandy. In World War 2, on average, the Germans lost one soldier killed every 30 seconds, and 3-4 times as many wounded. The present NATO armies would be gone in 3-4 months. That’d amount to almost a million and a half dead and wounded. NATO would collapse. Greeks would refuse to fight. Serbs would be a war in the middle of all this. Cypriots would refuse to fight. Turkey would likely also refuse to die in a war they could only lose from. Bulgaria would probably revolt. Romania and Italy and Spain and Portugal wouldn’t long suffer heavy casualties before they overthrew their unpopular governments, and France would be more than likely to do so also. The USA couldn’t fully concentrate their army, as they’d have to release their grip on other sectors, which, in turn, would be blowing up. As for a second front, that is, if America was to invade the Russian Far East, well, outside of grabbing Sakhalin and Vladivostok and Khabarovsk, all of which would cost hundreds of thousands of corpses, an American invasion force would face a march of 3,000 kilometres (about 1,800 miles) to the nearest major oil fields and have to cover a land area larger than the continental USA, in wilderness terrain, with Russian partisans and the very cold Siberian winter (8 months long) filling the corpse lists daily. In other words, outside of a temporary land grab, nothing to fear. In addition, if things got bad, China would step in, knowing that they’re next on the hit list, and thus Siberia would be safe from American forces.

The reality, Americans, Germans, and foolish Poles, is that Russia will fight and its 152 million people will fight to the end, not because Putin is in power, or because we fear the enemy, but because our love of Russia, the very idea of Russia, will drive fanatical and well-trained resistance, armed with advanced weaponry. Russians will fight regardless of who’s in power, because we aren’t fighting for a leader, but for Christ and for Russia, the land He gave us as the Third Rome. What exactly would you fight for?

23 March 2015

Stanislav Mishin

Mat Rodina


Next Page »

The Rubric Theme. Blog at WordPress.com.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,160 other followers