Voices from Russia

Monday, 17 August 2015

Alaska’s Unangax Work to Preserve Culture Quashed by World War II Internment

00 alaska native 170815

______________________________

Harriet Hope’s family was last together in one place at the dawn of World War II, when she was five-years-old. In 1942, Hope was one of nearly 900 indigenous Unangax that were given only hours of notice to pack one suitcase and leave their homes in Alaska’s Aleutian and Pribilof islands. Without any choice or sign of where they were going, American soldiers put them onto crowded ships, who sent them to squalid internment camps in the then-territory’s southeastern rainforests. Hope, now in her late 70s, said, “Our whole lives were just a total upside down wreck. It was a huge tragedy that the US government pushed on us”. In 1945, the USA resettled the last interned Unangax. According to the National Parks Service, at least 74 people died in the camps, many from the unsanitary conditions. Many elders, who would’ve passed on traditions and customs to younger generations, succumbed to disease in the camps, along with the very young. Seven decades later, the cultural damage of the internment is still clear and many of the remaining survivors are hesitant to talk about the experience. However, even as the number of survivors dwindles, Unangax communities peppered along hundreds of miles of volcanic islands are working to preserve and restore their culture through educational programmes geared towards their youngest members.

Restoring a Culture

Sharon Svarny-Livingston’s mother, Harriet Hope’s older sister, was 12 when the family had to leave Unalaska. She went to a boarding school with other school-aged Unangax kids. She said, “The boarding school was the first place they learned that they would be beaten for speaking their language. So, a whole generation of these kids never taught their kids to speak their language. Our mother never taught us. When you lose those languages, you lose so much”. In the 1990s, for a short time, the school in Unalaska was able to hire a teacher who was fluent in the native language. As a result, they passed on the language, Unungam Tunuu, to a few young people, including the man who is now the Russian Orthodox priest in Unalaska. Svarny-Livingston noted, “To be able to keep that language in the church and be able to have the kids hear it is so important”. Svarny-Livingston also mentioned how important it is to teach subsistence to the next generation, the traditional way of living off the land and sea still practised by many Alaska Native communities, “It’s not necessary to survive, it’s necessary to sustain spirit”. Harriet Hope recalled, “None of the men were able to bring any kind of subsistence gear when they were interned. We couldn’t go out on our own and subsist. It’s sad. They just disconnected us from our whole culture”.

In the decades following the internment, Alaska’s Unangax community mobilised to preserve its cultural traditions; it’s created programs to pass them onto the next generation. Crystal Dushkin of Atka, who is involved in one of several Alaska summer camps that promote Unangax culture, said, “I’ve always wanted us to keep everything we’ve had and make sure that future generations know about it and learn about it, because it’s who we are, we aren’t the immigrants that make up the rest of this country. We actually originated here. This is where we belong”. The camps focus on traditional foods and other activities, such as basket weaving and carpentry. Dushkin observed, “So much has been lost as a result of World War II, and just all the changes that have come around since then”.

Rachel Mason, senior anthropologist with the National Park Service’s Alaska Regional Office, said, “The internment really hastened the erosion of some of the old customs. The deaths of many elders and the forgetting the language, and being outside of their ordinary environment, hastened the loss of the traditional way of life”. Mason was part of an effort that facilitated a trip to several Unangax villages never resettled after the internment. In 2010, a handful of former residents and their families visited three such settlements. She added, “It’s painful thing, and the trauma continues”.

Dark Years

The Japanese invaded Alaska in 1942, capturing the 44 inhabitants of the Unangax village on Attu in the Aleutian Islands. They eventually took them to Japan as POWs, where many would die, including Brenda Maly’s great-grandfather. Maly, 39, whose grandfather Nick Golodoff was six when the Japanese captured Attu, said, “They were strong at the time. My grandfather’s mother, I think she was the strongest of them all, because she remained strong after her husband disappeared in Japan”. Eventually released, the US government didn’t allow the surviving people of Attu to return to their village, as the battle to take back the islands destroyed its remnants. Maly, who has never been to Attu, said, “The war robbed them and future generations of their island and their sense of place. It’s history. If there’s no history, there’s no today”.

The Japanese also bombed the port of Dutch Harbor near Unalaska, prompting the quick evacuation of the Unangax to camps near Juneau in 1942. The government only forced the native people of the Aleutians to leave their homes and villages… they allowed the region’s white residents to stay, sometimes, breaking up mixed families like Hope’s. Even though they were still in Alaska, the camps were in a different world. They dropped the Unangax in the damp forested panhandle in southeastern Alaska, more than a thousand miles across the Gulf of Alaska, far from the treeless, wind-swept islands in the North Pacific and Bering Sea they’d called home for thousands of years. Hope said, “It just broke up the whole family, and it broke up other families. When it came time to come home, a lot of them couldn’t come home for whatever reason, and a lot of them got back home and their homes were just wrecked by the military. It’s just sad”. 88-year-old Nicholai Lekanoff said of Unalaska’s historic Russian Orthodox church, recalling when he first saw it after the war, “They’d thrown rocks and everything at it. [They’d] broken the windows”.

There were as many as 20,000 Unangax living in the Aleutian Islands when Russian explorers arrived in the late 1700s. There were less than 1,000 in the islands by the time of the internment after waves of violence, disease, and famine took its toll on the population over the centuries. Near Juneau, the government put the Unangax in inadequate living quarters, sometimes, dozens of people in one structure, with a few days’ clothes. There was no electricity or running water. Tuberculosis and other diseases persisted with little or no medical services available in most of the camps. Survivors reported facing discrimination in nearby towns where many sought work. Hope recalled, As I grew into the age that my mother was at the time [of the internment], I thought, ‘My gosh, how did they manage this?’ I started getting angrier and angrier because of what they’d done not to me, but to my parents and family”. Congress passed the Aleut Restitution Act in 1988, giving a one-time payment to the surviving Unangax evacuees, months after granting Japanese-American internment survivors similar compensation. The act also provided funds to restore damaged Russian Orthodox churches in Unangax villages. Hope remembered getting her restitution check, reportedly about half the amount given to Japanese-Americans, in the mail, and thinking it was too little too late, “This shouldn’t ever happen to another group of people again. How they got away with it last time is beyond me”.

16 August 2015

Ryan Schuessler

al-Jazeera America

http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/8/16/alaskas-unangax-work-to-preserve-culture-quashed-by-wwii-internment.html

Advertisement

Friday, 13 December 2013

Link Between Native Americans and Siberia Encoded in DNA History

00 Tlingit people in traditional regalia. Alaska USA. 13.12.13

Tlingit people of Alaska in traditional regalia

______________________________

Recently, a team of scientists, including seven researchers from Russia, revealed the results of a study on the DNA of the ancient inhabitants of Siberia during the Upper Palaeolithic period. Scientists were able to obtain new data on the early stages of human settlement in various continents, including the Americas. The research confirmed that the first inhabitants of the Americas, the Paleo-Indians, arrived via Beringia, an isthmus between Siberia and Alaska that existed at that time. Scientists consider Altai Krai the genetic birthplace of the first Americans. Their ancestors settled in Siberia and eventually reached the Americas. Whilst the first Americans were thought to have a close genetic relationship with East Asia, until now, scientists weren’t able to determine exactly to which people of the Old World their genes could be most closely be associated with. Through the study, scientists were able to make new conclusions about the makeup of ancient Native Americans.

The team, led by Maanasa Raghavan of the University of Copenhagen, studied the genome of the ancient inhabitants of Siberia and compared these data with the genes of other peoples. They published their results in Nature. The researchers took a DNA sample from the 24,000-year-old skeleton of an ancient inhabitant of Siberia, discovered during excavations in 1928–58 in Usolsky Raion (Irkutsk Oblast), near Malta station. Now, it’s part of the State Hermitage Museum collection. Scientists conducted DNA sequencing on the remains and compared the data with the genomes of individuals belonging to 11 modern ethnic groups, four Eurasian groups (ancestors of modern Mari, Tajiks, Avars, and East Indians), as well as with the genome associated with Denisovans, a subspecies of Homo Sapiens discovered recently in the Altai Mountains. The results showed how the Karitiana, an indigenous people from Brazil, are genetically close to ancient Siberians.

From these results, the study concluded that genes typical of the people of West Eurasia came to the Americas earlier than previously believed… namely 24,000 years ago, during the Upper Palaeolithic period. Furthermore, the data revealed why Native Americans carry haplogroup X, a mitochondrial DNA haplogroup commonly occurring among the peoples of western Eurasia, but not found among East Asians. Lyudmila Osipova, co-author of the study and head of the Population Ethno-Genetics Laboratory at the Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAN, said, “The results refer to the early stages of peopling of the continents, particularly Siberia and the Americas. In addition, they have indirect links to the issues of race genesis, although scientists discuss the matter cautiously. However, the issue is biological in nature and deeply connected to the topic of adaptation of human populations and to their different living conditions in different climatic zones of the globe”.

Osipova argued that despite the relatively good degree of research conducted by geneticists on the early peopling of our planet and the identification of early human migration patterns, life is more complicated than any taxonomy, saying, “The question is… ‘At what level of organisation were race genesis processes taking place… Homo sapiens, or, even at earlier stages?’ There are a lot of discoveries still to be made”. According to Osipova, the study confirms an earlier hypothesis about the origins of Native Americans, and provides a great deal of fundamental knowledge on lesser known aspects of migrations, including the movements of the people belonging to the European type towards the territory of Siberia in ancient times.

1 December 2013

Yana Khlyustova

Russia Behind the Headlines

http://rbth.ru/science_and_tech/2013/12/01/link_between_native_americans_and_siberia_encoded_in_dna_his_32159.html

 

Sunday, 24 March 2013

A View from Moscow by Valentin Zorin… The End of the American Empire

01 Fidel Castro and Uncle Sam

______________________________

The death of Venezuelan President Hugo Rafael Chávez Frías knocked Washington off-balance and stripped it of confidence. Breaking the traditional rules of diplomatic courtesy, US President Obama refrained from extending condolences to the people and government of Venezuela, unlike the heads of state of most other countries. Those in the American corridors of power must have lost their nerve.

In this case, Chávez’s extraordinary personality didn’t cause this state of affairs; rather, the tectonic policy shift that embodied Chávez’s philosophy devastated the USA. For two centuries, South America provided solid and reliable support for a country whose very name… the United States of America… incorporated claims to speaking on behalf of both parts of the American continent. In 1823, the fifth US President, James Monroe, proclaimed in a message to the US Congress that all territories south of the American border were the USA’s “exclusive sphere of influence”. It’s worth remembering that the text of the so-called Monroe Doctrine stated that the USA would consider any attempt on the part of any other country to interfere militarily or politically in the affairs of any state in the Americas as hostile, a threat to its peace and security. Without any diplomatic frou-frou, Senator Lodge explained the essence of Monroe Doctrine by saying, “The American flag must fly over the territory from the Rio Grande to the Arctic”.

The Monroe Doctrine was a guide for several generations of politicians as they replaced one another at the helm of the American state. After World War I, US President Woodrow Wilson insisted that the Monroe Doctrine be part of the Covenant of the League of Nations. By using brute force, Washington kept South America under its thumb. After American troops invaded Mexico in 1846, the USA de facto carved that country up {part of it became the south-western USA after the American victory: editor}. Besides that, the USA propped up bloody puppet juntas in Central America like those of General Anastasio Somoza García in Nicaragua. US President Franklin D Roosevelt threw out a famous cynical bon mot concerning him, “Somoza may be a son of a bitch, but he’s our son of a bitch”.

After the Second World War, Washington didn’t loosen its iron grip on Latin America; it still held it under its tight control. Subservient Latin American delegations at the UN comprised an infamous “voting machine”; it was one of Washington’s major policy tools in the early years of the Cold War. The Cuban Revolution was the first peal of thunder. The multiple, but unsuccessful, attempts to suppress it marked the beginning of the end for the empire south of the American border. A bloc of states chose to reject Washington’s diktatBrazil’s economic and political weight grew exponentially, Nicaragua broke free, Panama snatched the Panama Canal from America’s grip, and Hugo Chávez’s Venezuela went on to head an anti-American front in Latin America. All this became a nightmare for the proponents of the outmoded Monroe Doctrine. The 200-year-old American Empire is no more, never to return. Judging from their nervousness, the power élite in Washington is unaware or is unwilling to recognise that. So much the worse… for them!

zorin_v19 March 2013

Valentin Zorin

Voice of Russia World Service

http://rus.ruvr.ru/2013_03_19/203903965/

Saturday, 8 September 2012

As John Robles Sees It… Québec and “Independence” In the Americas: History and Today

______________________________

With the secessionists winning the elections in Québec, the world is full of speculation that they’ll secede from Canada. In this piece, I take a brief look at independence in the Americas and give my take on the Québécois and others in North America who claim to want to be free, but refuse to pay the price for that freedom. Classically, the French and the English have never really shared much love for each other. This goes back to the years of the great empire building and the wars for the Americas between the Spanish, French, and English, with the Portuguese and other nations playing a smaller role.

The Spanish, one could say, won the wars for the Americas hands down, partly because they were able to assimilate better with the Indians and the indigenous peoples. Rather than attempting to annihilate the natives completely, they assimilated into a single ethnos. The Spanish won more territory, taking over part of North America and almost all Central and South America, except for a smaller area won by the Portuguese.

For the French, loyal to France and the Bourbon throne, it was a different story. For their part, the English were mostly drunken cut-throats, murderers, and misfits of all sorts, who hated England, who engaged in a campaign of genocide against the indigenous people. The English chased the natives far to the North, where the French also waged a war of annihilation on the Indians, albeit on a smaller scale. In turn, those who refused to pay allegiance to their rightful king chased the Tories, who were loyal to Britain and the British King, to the North, in what history knows as the American Revolutionary War {this was the first and most successful of the Three Great Godless Revolutions: editor}.

When the grandiose schemes of Napoleon led to the failure of the French Empire, Québec became a consolation prize for the French settlers in the Americas. It was a cold and unforgiving place; a land that the English weren’t all that interested in. In the end, in fact, the French ended being subjugated and controlled by their historic rivals from across la Manche, as English-speaking Canadians and the Tories paid allegiance to Britain and its Monarchy, they controlled what came to be known as Québec.

Personally, for me, it’s difficult to feel sympathy for any of these people as they committed the worst genocide in the history of all mankind against my people. Given that fact, they’re all living on stolen land, so, to me, any discussion of Québec becoming independent from Canada seems absurd and a denial of history. Nevertheless, for the most part, the Indians are gone and those who’re left are contained and voiceless, except for a very few. Ignoring those facts, as the world has been trained to do, allow me to continue. The Québécois are proud of their heritage, their language, and their culture. They’re also proud of what differentiates them from the English and, in particular, from Americans.

Amongst these differences is the level of violence in society. Many French Canadians view themselves as pacifists, and violence, especially gun violence, in the country is rare. Therefore, the American-style shooting outside of the victory speech by the new premier has many worried that this may be a sign that American-style mass shootings may be coming to Canada. That’s not very likely, as Canada has strict gun laws and a working social safety net for the population, including housing and healthcare; nevertheless, people are worried. Will Québec secede from Canada? That’s not very likely either, as the people are too comfortable with what they have and the way things are, they may complain, but few are willing to pay the price and go through all of the trouble that’d be involved. Freedom and independence are not as important as all of the nice things they think they’re provided with, and many just want to be left alone to live their lives, pay their mortgages, and raise their children.

Therefore, we have a continuation of the bickering over the division of lands stolen from the Indians. Since this is an opinion piece, I’ll give you my opinion… we should allow the Indian people to hold a referendum on whether they wish the invaders to stay on their lands. Based on the answer, then, we should proceed from there. That’s wishful thinking, since that’s never going to happen, and, in fact, the whole topic isn’t even worth discussing because it’s up to the people of Québec themselves to decide on whether or not they wish to stay a part of Canada, and they won’t be doing that anytime soon. In their eyes, they have too much to lose, and I’ve already said that it’d be too troublesome and adversely affect their comfortable lives. The same problem exists in Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, the Maldives, and a host of other territories or possessions, where the people are too comfortable with the things that they think the colonisers have given them, and they fear the consequences of self-determination.

In this way, capitalism and the West manipulated and literally bought off much of the world. Were trade and import export levels balanced worldwide, this would no longer pose a problem, but unfortunately, there are only a small group of countries controlling the flow of goods and services worldwide. If we could break this grip, then, there might be a chance for equality and an improved standard of living for the entire planet. This idea doesn’t sit well with the USA or the world’s leading trade powerhouses, for if they lost the trade wars, they’d lose a significant instrument that they use to advance their imperialist ambitions.

In reality, it’s strange for me, a person of Arawak (Taíno)/Spanish descent, who’s assimilated and been accepted in Russia, to be writing about French and English squabbles, people who not long ago brutally committed genocide against my people and are still bickering over the lands they stole, with the Québécois making claims to wanting their own country on lands that aren’t theirs to begin with. If the Québécois want independence, I say, “More power to them, they should stand up and have the fortitude to fight for their independence and stop whining”. Many peoples would go to war for such a chance, but all the Québécois have to do is have a referendum and go through some difficulties. If freedom isn’t that important to them, so be it, but stop whining. I’d say the same thing to my fellow Puerto Ricans, but they’ve been so brainwashed that the very idea of freedom, self-determination, and independence is an abomination to them. They’re too afraid to even think about such a thing, and they’re content to be an American possession.

Before I go, I just want to say to those who might write to me about Chechnya and the Russian Caucasus, those lands are and have been a part of Russia, and were not annexed or taken possession of. The question shouldn’t be where would we be without our McDonalds, Coca-Cola, and Chevrolet cars, the question should be… “What would it be like to breathe freely?”

8 September 2012

John Robles

Voice of Russia World Service

http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_09_08/Quebec-and-independence-in-the-Americas-history-and-today/

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.