
________________________
Editor:
Note who’s saying this… Alfeyev was always cosy with Westerners (especially, papists), but this drives a wedge between him and his Western pals. The Westerns get peevish when vexed, and they’ve decided that they’re going to defend the JW nutters. I think that Alfeyev’s ambition is kicking in… he lusts for the Patriarchal throne… but his pro-Western stance makes him the most hated of all MP hierarchs. Paris has ALWAYS been worth a mass… but will it work for Alfeyev or will he be another Dmitri Banditsky? Only time will tell us…
BMD
******
Metropolitan Ilarion Alfeyev, the head of the MP OVTsS told us:
The Church welcomes the ruling of the Supreme Court to prohibit Jehovah’s Witnesses’ activities in Russia, as it destroys the traditional family.
In speaking on The Church and the World on the Rossiya24 news channel, he said:
This’ll weaken the JW’s influence, but it’d be scarcely possible to eliminate it altogether. One should hardly have any doubts these sectarians would remain and would continue their activity, but at any rate, they’d stop equating themselves with Christian denominations openly. To paraphrase it, this product won’t be on the market of existing denominations of Christianity anymore. This’ll save families and people’s lives, and I think a ruling of this kind is only welcome. The JWs are a totalitarian sect that misinterprets the Gospels and, on top of that, they destroy families. The real danger isn’t in their distortions of faith; the danger is in their being a totalitarian sect that focuses its entire activity on manipulating the human consciousness. They destroy the human psyche; they destroy families.
The religious doctrine of Jehovah’s Witnesses prohibits blood transfusions. In addition, members of a family can’t sit at the same table with any relative if, for whatever reason, they decide to leave the sect. Metropolitan Ilarion said:
I think that we should hail the decision, but the Church didn’t take part in any way in its formulation. No one asked us for our opinion. In general, the Church never advocates subjecting heretics or sectarians or other dissenters to criminal persecution. When the state takes such decisions, it’s a judicial decision finding that a sect engages in extremist activities. The case in this situation doesn’t encroach on any religion in any way, but rather it treats with violations of the law.
2 May 2017
TASS
http://tass.com/society/944305
20 October 2018. Genprokuratura Reclassifies Kerch Terakt as Criminal Matter
Tags: Crime, Crime and Justice, Crimea, Criminal Code, Genprokuratura, legal, political commentary, politics, Republic of the Crimea, RF Criminal Code, Russia, Russian, SK RF, True Crime
__________________
The Genprokuratura reclassified the Kerch terakt from terrorism to murder. That is, it views it more as a criminal matter than a terrorist incident. Trust me, it doesn’t mean that the incident wasn’t momentous or that there wasn’t a serious loss of life. It simply means that the preponderance of the evidence points to a criminal rather than a terrorist action. It doesn’t lessen the tragedy one little bit, however, it does change the complexion of the response. I’ll say this, though… the security at the Kerch Bridge just went up a notch. NATO is boasting that it’s going to hold exercises in the Sea of Azov. To do so means crossing the Kerch Strait, which is in Russian territorial waters. I do hope that the boastful and feral Anglos rethink this one…
Just one last thing… the Galician Uniates and schismos are all agog with glee on the web over this tragic event. It tells you much about them and their American paymasters, doesn’t it?
BMD