Voices from Russia

Sunday, 12 March 2017

Sinn Fein’s Breakthrough Brings a United Ireland Closer Than It’s Ever Been

____________________________________

It’d be fair to say that Sinn Fein’s historic electoral breakthrough in the recent elections to Northern Ireland’s devolved Assembly legislature took almost everyone by surprise, including them. With this breakthrough, Sinn Fein (English: “We Ourselves”) just shattered the veto of the ruling Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) for the first time since the inception of the Northern Ireland Assembly in 1998, along with the province’s power-sharing government, as part of the Good Friday Agreement, which brought an end to three decades of conflict known as the Troubles. The new Assembly elections were held after Sinn Fein’s Martin McGuinness resigned from his post as Deputy First Minister in protest at the refusal of the Assembly’s First Minister, the DUP’s Arlene Foster, to step down over a financial scandal surrounding a botched renewable energy scheme that she helped to set up and which is set to cost taxpayers in Northern Ireland up to 480 million UK Pounds (34.48 billion Roubles. 4.04 billion Renminbi. 38.84 billion INR. 584.06 million USD. 786.76 million CAD. 774.31 million AUD. 547.21 million Euros).

Yet though this particular scandal and Foster’s intransigence may be the proximate cause of the bad feeling between Sinn Fein and the DUP, various unresolved political and sectarian issues emanating from the Troubles also lie at its heart. For many unionists both inside and outside the DUP, political parity with Sinn Fein (and the Irish Republicans and the Catholic communities they represent) has always been anathema. It has been this way ever since the partitioned British statelet of Northern Ireland began in 1921, out of the negotiations that ended the Anglo-Irish War of 1919-21. Northern Ireland’s Catholic minority, cut off from the Catholic-majority Irish Republic south of the border, saw succeeding generations denied the same civil rights as the Protestant majority in the province.

The modern conflict, the Troubles, erupted in the late 1960s when a mass civil rights movement… non-violent, non-sectarian, and peaceful… emerged in Northern Ireland to demand those civil rights for Catholics still denied justice and equality when it came to housing, employment, and political representation. When the movement began to win concessions from the British government, the Protestant majority began to feel their dominant position and status under threat, resulting in a wave of sectarian-inspired attacks on Catholic communities in Belfast. The need to defend Catholics from this campaign of terror saw the birth of the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA), colloquially known as the Provos, in 1969. Attacks on the civil rights movement continued into the 1970s, culminating in Bloody Sunday in January 1972, when soldiers belonging to the élite British Parachute Regiment shot and killed 17 unarmed protesters in Derry during a mass march for civil rights. This event effectively destroyed the province’s non-violent movement for civil rights, while at the same time increasing support and recruitment to the PIRA.

Roughly 3,600 people died during the Troubles, with thousands more maimed and injured. All sides in this conflict committed atrocities. It’s high point, its apogee, was the 1981 Hunger Strikes, in which ten Republican prisoners at the specially-built prison facility just outside Belfast, the H-Blocks, starved themselves to death in protest at the British government’s removal of their status as political prisoners. The man who led the Hunger Strike and was first to die, Bobby Sands, achieved international fame and recognition. The likes of Fidel Castro and Nelson Mandela (and others like them around the world) lauded Sands for his courage and stance in the cause of national liberation. His detractors dismissed and continue to dismiss Bobby Sands as a terrorist, however, along with his comrades. This polarisation is still entrenched in Northern Irish politics up to the present day, one evident in the current spat between Sinn Fein and the DUP over the position of Arlene Foster.

Another important factor in Sinn Fein’s remarkable electoral breakthrough is the party’s opposition to Brexit. A majority of people in Northern Ireland voted to Remain in the EU during the UK-wide referendum on the issue, held in June 2016. This was no surprise considering that the province has benefited significantly from the UK’s membership of the EU in the form of agricultural and various other subsidies. Brexit throws up the issue of the border between British-controlled Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic, which remains part of the EU. The prospect of what is currently an open border being changed to a hard border as a result of Brexit gave rise to serious concerns north and south of the border over a peace process that is far from impervious to such significant political and social shocks. Ultimately, Sinn Fein’s growing political success and influence in Northern Ireland is a testament to the party’s strong opposition to Brexit and a political vision that is far more progressive and compelling than any offered by their unionist opponents and counterparts. It also places the question of a united Ireland firmly back on the table.

John Wright

Sputnik International

https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201703071051337394-sinn-fein-electoral-breakthrough/

Sunday, 13 November 2016

Brexit Process Pushes Scottish Unionists Toward Regional Independence From UK

00-scotland-pro-independence-131116

____________________________________

On Sunday, Ahmed Asif, a spokesman for the Scottish National Party (SNP) told us that the continuing process of Britain’s exit from the EU stimulated a number of Scottish politicians, who used to oppose independence from the UK to reconsider their opinion. On Friday, Alex Rowley, Deputy Leader of the Scottish Labour Party, called on his party fellows to denounce its unionist policy and called for it to adopt a more federalist position. Asif said:

Many Labour supporters voted for independence in 2014, and faced with being dragged to the EU exit door by the hard right of the Tory party, it’s no surprise that many more are reconsidering their opposition to independence. After the majority of Scots voiced their support to the UK’s EU membership, they realised the possible impact of Brexit on the country’s economy and other issues.

On 23 June, the UK held a referendum in which 51.9 percent of voters, or 17.4 million people, opted for the country to leave the EU. At the same time, the majority of voters in both Scotland and Northern Ireland opposed such an exit. Following the referendum, Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon (SNP) said that Scotland would consider to take a vote on independence one more time after a failed attempt in September 2014, claiming that Brexit referendum outcome neglected its desire to stay in the EU.

13 November 2016

Sputnik International

https://sputniknews.com/europe/201611131047394080-brexit-scotland-exit/

Sunday, 26 June 2016

Sein Fein Calls for all-Irish Unity Referendum in Northern Ireland

01-voting-ballot-box

______________________________

On Friday, Sinn Fein chairman Declan Kearney, leader of Northern Ireland’s largest Irish nationalist party, stated:

A British vote to leave the EU intensifies the case for a vote on whether Northern Ireland should leave the UK. This outcome tonight dramatically changes the political landscape here in the north of Ireland; we’ll intensify our case for the calling of a border poll on a united Ireland. As a direct result, the British government forfeited any mandate to represent the interests of people here in the north of Ireland, in circumstances where they dragged the north out of Europe because of a vote to leave.

24 June 2016

Huffington Post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sinn-fein-brexit-reaction_us_576cbc1ae4b017b379f586f9?k37j8i16oqeabgldi

26 June 2016. Sturgeon on the Brexit… The Law of Unintended Consequences Strikes Again!

00 sturgeon on the brexit scotland 260616

______________________________

If Scotland became independent and left NATO… a very real possibility… it’d mean that the USA wouldn’t have access to the Orkneys and the Shetlands. That’d mean that they couldn’t really secure the GIUK gap. Therefore, if Scotland voted for freedom, do watch the Yanks. Their reputation for aggression, coups, assassinations, and general mayhem is well-deserved and well-founded… they’re “exceptional”, after all. They believe that “winning is the only thing”… you turn your back on an Anglo at your own risk…

Watch for the Yanks to install Bojo as UK PM… he’s one of them in spirit and has the bloodymindedness and nastiness to do their bidding in re Scotland, Wales, and Ireland. Besides that, he was born in New York City to British parents, so he has dual citizenship. If he became PM, it’d be disastrous for the UK…

BMD

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.