______________________________
Editor’s Note:
I must admit that I dislike most people who call themselves “progressives”. I’m a no-holds-barred leftist. I’ve walked a picket line or two, I’ve been on public assistance (no longer, but I was on it due to America‘s nasty-ass parsimonious UIB laws), I’m proud that I belonged to the CWA, and I’ve worked in unregulated non-union shops. Therefore, I know a thing or two about the pressures facing most ordinary folk first-hand. I’ll be blunt… I hate “limousine liberals” and their cockamamie notions. They’re going to tell us what to do as they know so much better than we do, dontcha know, their oh-so-“caring” condescension just oozes out all over the place. Please, do spare me. It’s also why I have no respect for the so-called “Pro-Life” movement. They wave placards and support the most feral GOP politicians of the lot… those who favour perpetual warmongering and brutal union-busting. No way for this gal! I won’t support a movement that supports the most vicious members of Congress. That’s that.
We need a real discussion between the various classes in America… we don’t need nostrums from the Upper Middles (who see themselves as Saviours, whether from the right or from the “left”). I don’t see that happening. Until it does, we’re heading for a train wreck. I don’t want to see that, but that’s what I see. Shall we avert it? God alone knows…
BMD
******
Unemployment Insurance Fails In the US Senate
Arthur Delaney and Sam Stein wrote on the Huffington Post that legislation to bring back unemployment insurance for over a million long-term jobless Americans failed to clear the US Senate. Benefits lapsed for 1.3 million workers on 28 December due to congressional inaction. Each week since the lapse, another 70,000 laid off workers reach the end of their state benefits, which in most cases last six months, and find that the federal benefits that previously helped millions of workers won’t help them. Lawmakers knew about the looming deadline for a whole year but did nothing until it was too late. Marcia Carroll, 43, of Staunton VA, one the people whose benefits stopped last month, said, “None of them care about the working person”.
******
”Worse than Bush”: Green Groups Sound Alarm over Obama’s Trade Deal
Citing a report by WikiLeaks, Jacob Chamberlain, writing for Common Dreams, reported that the draft environmental chapter of the upcoming Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal renders any potential environmental protections “toothless”, as it lacks enforcement mechanisms between countries, such as penalties or criminal sanctions, and is largely “a public relations exercise”. A joint statement issued by the Sierra Club, the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), and the Natural Resources Defense Council, who analysed the document, stated, “Instead of committing TPP countries to ‘adopt, maintain, and implement’ the laws, regulations, and all other measures to fulfil its obligations under [Multilateral Environmental Agreements] and subject those obligations to dispute settlement, each TPP country is merely committed to ‘affirm its commitment’ to implement the MEAs to which it is a party”.
******
Congressman’s New Jobs Plan: Deny Women Access to Abortion So They Can Make More Babies
According to Tara Culp-Ressler writing on ThinkProgress, US Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) suggested that Republicans support restricting access to abortion because it’d ultimately benefit the economy if women have more children. During a debate over an anti-abortion bill currently advancing in Congress, he said, referring to the bill that he’s promoting, that carrying pregnancies to term “very much promotes job creation. It very much promotes job creation for all the care, and services, and so on that need to be provided by a lot of people to raise children”. The No Taxpayer Funding For Abortion Act would dramatically restrict women’s access to affordable abortion care by imposing restrictions on insurance coverage and tax credits for the procedure.
******
Leaked Walmart Documents Reveal Propaganda Campaign to Fight Workers Attempting to Organise
According to Aaron Cantú writing on AlterNet, Walmart is attempting to win the hearts and minds of its employees by scaring them out of joining OUR Walmart, a Walmart workers’ collective that has organised strikes on behalf of all the company’s most vulnerable employees. The propaganda campaign is aimed at Walmart’s managerial staff, the corporation’s last line of defence in barring its low-wage workers from organizing for higher pay and better conditions. Walmart, the largest employer in the country, racked up 447 billion USD (15 billion Roubles. 490 million CAD. 590 million AUD. 330 million Euros. 272 million UK Pounds) in revenue in 2011, yet its workers’ wages are so low the taxpayers actually have to pay a significant amount each year for workers’ public assistance.
16 January 2014
Voice of Russia World Service
We’re Writing Off the Unemployed (Another Reason Why I Reject the Republican Party Absolutely and Completely)
Tags: Alan Blinder, cartoons, editorial cartoons, Josh Mitchell, Non-Hispanic Whites, Paul Krugman, political commentary, Rand Paul, Republican, right-wing, Russia, Unemployment, Unemployment benefits, unemployment level, United States, Urban Institute, USA, Western world
THIS is the attitude of the Republican Party and their oligarch paymasters… any questions?
______________________________
Back in 1987, my Princeton colleague Alan Blinder published a very good book entitled Hard Heads, Soft Hearts. It was, as you might guess, a call for tough-minded but compassionate economic policy. Unfortunately, what we actually got… especially, although not only, from Republicans… was the opposite. Moreover, it’s difficult to find a better example of the hard-hearted softheaded nature of today’s GOP than what happened last week, as Senate Republicans once again used the filibuster to block aid to the long-term unemployed. What do we know about long-term unemployment in America?
First, it’s still at near-record levels. Historically, the long-term unemployed… those out of work for 27 weeks or more… usually, are from 10 to 20 percent of total unemployment. Today, the number is 35.8 percent. Yet, we allowed extended unemployment benefits, which went into effect in 2008, to lapse. As a result, few of the long-term unemployed receive any support. Second, if you think the typical long-term unemployed American is one of Those People… non-white, poorly educated, etc… you’re wrong, according to research by the Urban Institute’s Josh Mitchell. Half of the long-term unemployed are non-Hispanic whites. College graduates are less likely to lose their jobs than those with less education, but once they do, they’re actually a bit more likely than others are to join the ranks of the long-term unemployed. Workers older than 45-years-old are especially likely to spend a long time unemployed. Third, in a weak job market, long-term unemployment tends to be self-perpetuating, because employers, in effect, discriminate against the jobless. Many people suspected that this was the case, and, last year, Rand Ghayad of Northeastern University provided a dramatic confirmation. He sent out thousands of fictitious résumés in response to job ads, and found that potential employers were drastically less likely to respond if the fictitious applicant was out of work more than six months, even if they were better qualified than other applicants.
What all of this suggests is that the long-term unemployed are mainly victims of circumstances… ordinary American workers who had the bad luck to lose their jobs (which can happen to anyone) at a time of extraordinary labour market weakness, with three times as many people seeking jobs as there are openings. Once that happened, the very fact of their unemployment made it harder to find a new job. Therefore, how can politicians justify cutting off modest aid to their unlucky fellow citizens? Some Republicans justified the filibuster with the tired old argument that we can’t afford to increase the deficit. Actually, Democrats paired the benefits extension with measures to increase tax receipts. In any case, this is a bizarre objection at a time when federal deficits aren’t just falling, but clearly falling too fast, holding back economic recovery.
For the most part, however, Republicans justify their refusal to help by asserting that the real cause of long-term unemployment is because people aren’t trying hard enough to find jobs, and that extended benefits are part of the reason for their lack of effort. People who say things like this… like, such as, US Senator Rand Paul (R-KY)… probably imagine that they’re being tough-minded and realistic. In fact, they’re peddling a fantasy at odds with all the evidence. For example… if unemployment is high because people are unwilling to work, reducing the supply of labour, why aren’t wages going up?
However, evidence has a well-known liberal bias. The more their economic doctrine fails (remember how the Fed’s actions were supposed to produce runaway inflation?) the more fiercely conservatives cling to it. More than five years after a financial crisis plunged the Western world into what looks increasingly like a quasi-permanent slump, making nonsense of free-market orthodoxy, it’s hard to find a leading Republican who’s changed their mind on, well, anything. This imperviousness to evidence goes along with a stunning lack of compassion.
It’s striking how hard it is to find anyone on the Republican side even hinting at sympathy for the long-term jobless. Being unemployed is always presented as a choice, as something that only happens to losers. One often gets the sense that contempt for the unemployed comes first, that the supposed justifications for tough policies are rationalisations. The result is that they’ve written off millions of Americans… potential employers reject them; politicians whose fuzzy-mindedness matches the hardness of their hearts abandon them.
10 February 2014
Paul Krugman
New York Times
http://www.mercedsunstar.com/2014/02/10/3488407/were-writing-off-the-unemployed.html
Editor’s Note:
I’ll keep this short. If you support the Republican Agenda, you reject the Lord Christ and all that He taught. The Republicans support greed, torture, spying on ordinary folks, warmongering, and grasp for global hegemony… they worship Mammon. As Our Lord Christ said, No man can serve two masters (Gospel according to St Matthew 6.24)… neither can you. You can serve Christ or the Republican Party, but not both. That’s a “’Nuff said”…
The Republicans despise you as “lazy”… you’re not worth much in their eyes. Indeed, since 1981, they’ve done their best to erode your economic and political rights (PRISM and extreme rendition, anyone?). Then, why vote for them?
BMD