Metropolitan Hilarion Kapral (1948- ), Archbishop of New York and Eastern America, First Hierarch of the ROCOR
Over the past several days, an official delegation of hierarchs from the ROCOR headed by its First Hierarch, Metropolitan Hilarion of New York and Eastern America, has arrived in Moscow to take part in the Archpastoral Council. Before he departed for Moscow, Metropolitan Hilarion answered questions asked by journalists.
RG
This shall be your first trip to Russia in your capacity as First Hierarch of the ROCOR. How do you feel to be visiting the Russian capital?
Metropolitan Hilarion
This is far from my first visit to the capital city of Russia, but, now, when I am going to Moscow after accepting the labour of being the First Hierarch of the ROCOR, I feel a certain trepidation and a feeling of deep responsibility for our flock as I go to participate in the Archpastoral Council with my brother hierarchs of the MP. It is necessary for us to manifest to the world that we are capable of mutual love and understanding in our desire to be members of a united and indivisible church body.
RG
What problems do you intend to draw attention to in your participation in the Council, which is planned to discuss, in particular, questions concerned with the Christian comprehension of human rights and the details of ecclesiastical tribunals?
Metropolitan Hilarion
At present, I am not as overly concerned about my own contribution to the deliberations of the Council as I am that we understand the urgency of the problems before us and we state our solutions to them in relevant joint statements of the Council. At the same time, I hope to introduce to the Council, and, through its agency, the entire Orthodox community in the motherland, my views on the special tasks of Orthodoxy and church life abroad. In an atmosphere coloured by a shared faith and church tradition, there are distinctive aspects dictated by differences in political and cultural life that shaped the historical path of Orthodoxy abroad.
RG
On the day of your election as the head of the ROCOR you stated that “with outstretched arms we await the embrace of our separated brothers and sisters”. In your opinion, how complex is the task of continuing on the course of completing the reunification of the two parts of the Russian church?
Metropolitan Hilarion
I understand the full difficulty of the task of internal reunification, which has fallen upon me as primate, but, in reliance on God’s Will and His inscrutable plans, I understand my responsibility to my era, since according to the Apostle Hermes, the tower of the Church is built upon the people, each of whom has their unique place in its eternal foundation.
RG
This is now the second year since the signing of the Act of Canonical Communion. How well is the reunification of these two sister-churches proceeding?
Metropolitan Hilarion
The reunification of the two parts of the church, this was, in reality, a healing of old wounds inflicted during the bloody years of the persecution of the Church. I would say that there were many different manifestations of this healing over the years, but, officially, it occurred publicly as you present it. The ROCOR always considered itself to be in a state of exile, she knew herself to be a branch united with the stem, but, the political situation directed otherwise, and this was part of our pain during the years of separation.
Today, our yearnings have been fulfilled. However, there was a problem in that some did not realise that the time for reunification had come, for, you see, here in the West, more so than in Russia, ecumenism is viewed as a much more serious threat.
Our parishioners, having been reared in Orthodox families, perceive this ecumenical virus as being mortally dangerous, and, as a result, they are extremely suspicious of any contact with bodies such as the WCC. The problem of the erosion of the spiritual boundaries of the Church, of using this as an excuse to not associate with the Church in the motherland, is one of the main reasons for distrust and disputes amongst us abroad.
RG
What is the state of the ROCOR today? Are the problems that you are faced with in church life similar to those encountered by your brothers in Russia?
Metropolitan Hilarion
The ROCOR is still in many ways a church “in exile”. It found itself on foreign soil, and it had to survive in an environment with customs and a culture inimical to it, added to this was the struggle to maintain Russian cultural and religious values. Our problem is not in the number of our flock, but, in its national and class composition. Each parish has difficulties with the language issue, not so much in social interaction, as one finds in the services. Yes, our Russian parishioners love the services celebrated in the melodious Church Slavonic language. They perceive the closeness, the immanence, of the Orthodox sacraments in its poetry.
Although our non-Russian parishioners also love our moving hymnography, it would be ludicrous to expect everyone to study Church Slavonic, or even modern Russian, for that matter. The variety of nationalities in any given parish rivals that of the UN. As far as the tasks that we have in common with the church in the motherland, I would say one is Orthodox education, spreading the Word through preaching and theological exposition.
I hope that that our renewed church unity with the church in Russia shall strengthen our church life. I would also hope that our experience abroad would help the church in the motherland.
20 June 2008
Yuri Saikin
Vladimir Kakilo
Rossiskaya Gazeta (The Russian Newspaper)
As quoted in Interfax-Religion
http://www.interfax-religion.ru/?act=print&div=8526
You must be logged in to post a comment.