Voices from Russia

Saturday, 1 November 2014

1 November 2014. From the Russian Web… As It Was, As It Is, As It Ever Shall Be!

00 Tsar Nikolai Pavlovich. 01.11.14

______________________________

When I saw something like the above on the Russian web, I knew that I had to “English” it and bring it to you. Thanks to Google Image Search and PhotoShop, I was able to recreate what I saw. This IS truth…

The “Ukraine” is a legal fiction that doesn’t reflect reality. Great Russia is an undoubted reality… as is Malorossiya, Novorossiya, the Lvovshchina, Belarus, and Podkarpatskaya Rus. All of them (and more) make up Holy Rus.. which isn’t “Russian”… which isn’t “Ukrainian”… which isn’t “Byelorussian”… which isn’t “Rusin”… it’s all of them… it’s a unity that’s greater than the sum of its parts. No… Great Russians aren’t the “dictators” of Holy Rus… we’re merely the largest group within it (which is something else entirely). All of us have something to bring to the table… each party has an indispensable piece of the puzzle. There are no “low Russians” nor “high Russians”… those who think in such terms miss the entire point of it all. There is one Orthodoxy that shines forth in myriad ways… that’s something that we Great Russians must acknowledge. There is one Orthodoxy that shines through all the differences… that’s something that the Little Russians and Rusins must acknowledge. That is, we’ll have unity, both religious and secular, when we understand that the only path to it is mutual humility. Shall we realise it? That’s up to you…

As it was, as it is, as it ever shall be!

BMD

“The Times” of London Publishes a Fake!

00 The Times of London. sorry-ass propaganda. 01.11.14_______________________________

British oldie The Times acts the ass! Look at the photo, which illustrated the article about the parliamentary elections in Ukraine! The photo has the following caption… “More than five million people couldn’t vote as they were in the territories held by pro-Russian separatists”. As far as I understand, they guy in the helmet armed with a machine-gun is a pro-Russian separatist, and a woman in the Moslem dress is the embodiment of the much-suffering women in Donbass, whom the terrible “pro-Russian” separatists force to wear hijabs. Just in case, I present a picture from the timeline of the Associated Press. The photographer who took the photo is Mukhtar Khan; he took it in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. As you see, the picture has nothing to do with the Donbass, nor with the Ukrainian election.

PS

By the way, Mr Khan took the snap in Srinagar (sorry for this intimate detail).

29 October 2014

Vladimir Kornilov

blogger and political analyst from the Donbass

Novorossiya TV News

http://novorossia.today/editor-s-choice/the-times-publishes-a-fake.html

Editor:

This is par for the course for Western “coverage” of the given situation. Note well that the author of the piece stayed in Moscow, and didn’t go to Lugansk or Donetsk to find out things for himself. It certainly speaks poorly of The Times editorial staff… exposing them as lazy and ignorant charlatans. Then again, that’s common of the Western media in general, isn’t it? Of course, we Orthodox know that… all that we have to do is to look at Victor Potapov, Freddie M-G, and Rod Dreher to see world-class media phonies in action. Take this drivel posted by Dreher in 2010:

They all did it… by which I mean virtually the entire hierarchy is complicit to a greater or lesser degree in shuffling child-molesting priests around, or keeping them in some way in a position to commit their crimes. Why? Clericalism. The clerical class is what mattered most to these people, not the children and their families, to whom they were functionally indifferent… if anybody thinks Pope Benedict should resign, they should sober up and understand that there is almost certainly nobody under him who is untainted by this thing. This was the way the hierarchy operated for a very long time. At least, this current pope seems to have at long last been enlightened about the scope of this catastrophe, but he isn’t doing enough to make it right. What is it going to take?

http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/roddreher/2010/04/ratzinger-bishop-take-your-time-with-that-pedophile.html

******

Do note Mr Dreher’s silence about Feodosy Lazor… Pierre l’Huillier… Gleb Podmoshensky… Seraphim Storheim… the SVS pigs and their coverup of Eric Iliff’s death. There are interesting stories about his pal Dmitri Royster, too (I’ll simply say that they’re out there… believe them or not as you will… but Dreher was silent, fancy that). It puts a whole new spin on his rant, doesn’t it? The above is the same kind of shit that The Times is peddling about the Ukraine. In both cases, there’s a reckless disregard for the facts. This is truly too much of a muchness… do hand me the jug… I do know the crankness of the world, but must we see it at every turn?

BMD      

Friday, 31 October 2014

31 October 2014. OCA SOBs Shitcan Dickie Wood as Priest… NO MENTION OF IT ON OCA.ORG

01 Trash Can

______________________________

A Cabineteer sent me the following:

00 dickie wood letter. 31.10.14

******

I find the way that the OCA handled this is reprehensible and beneath the salt. Dickie deserved to get such news at a formal hearing… he deserved to have this posted on the official website so that the world would know what the SOBs (again… whether it’s “Synod of Bishops” or “Sons of Bitches” is up to you, dear reader) did. This is what decent and normal people do. Lyonyo and Jillions (this smells of them, no doubt about it) went too far this time. You see, other priests are going to ask, “Who’s next?” Jillions was none-too-bright to begin with, and Lyonyo has forgotten that there’s a whole world outside Syosset and its ingrown clique. No matter that Dickie Wood was arrogant and a self-promoter… there are procedures and due process, not only in the secular legal sense, but in Church law, too (as a real expert like Alexander Lebedeff would tell you).

Them whom the gods would destroy, first, they make them mad… if there was ever an apt occasion for that, it’s now. This is too much of a muchness. The people who did this are worthy of no respect whatsoever. Our Church institution has fallen and REFUSES to get up… isn’t that a sign that we have to do something about it? Just sayin’…

BMD

New Evidence, New Trial, Ex-Archbishop’s Lawyer Argues

00 25.09.12a cockatoo. court case.

______________________________

The lawyer for a former archbishop found guilty of sexually assaulting an altar boy in the 1980s says Manitoba’s highest court should consider fresh evidence and overturn the verdict. A Manitoba court convicted Seraphim Storheim early this year of sexually assaulting a boy who had come to visit him in Winnipeg in 1985. Storheim’s lawyer, Jeff Gindin, presented three Appeal Court judges with photos and documents Friday that suggest the boy was in Winnipeg in 1986 and not 1985. Storheim’s handwriting on the pictures says a boy “not from here” is participating in a church ceremony in 1986. Gindin argued that the evidence casts doubt on the credibility of the victim and the Crown’s version of events. He told the judges, “I never suggested this evidence taken by itself was a smoking gun. It could’ve been used to cross-examine witnesses presented by the Crown in a different way”.

Justice Alan MacInnes questioned the veracity of the pictures, which don’t name the boy, saying, “This is an exceptional remedy you’re seeking. It’s that way for good reason. At some point in time, cases end”. MacInnes pointed up that Christopher Mainella, the trial judge who convicted Storheim and who now sits on the Appeal Court, didn’t believe Storheim’s testimony, noting, “The irony of this is the person who is accused wasn’t believed by the trial judge and now we’re being asked to believe his evidence. Your own client said it was 1985. On your argument, your client was wrong. Why should we be accepting the motion for fresh evidence?” While Storheim was convicted of sexually assaulting one boy, he was acquitted on the same charge involving the victim’s brother, who also visited on a separate occasion.

31 October 2014

CTV News

http://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/canada/new-evidence-new-trial-ex-archbishop-s-lawyer-argues-1.2080471

Next Page »

Theme: Rubric. Get a free blog at WordPress.com

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 960 other followers