We can quote the Canons and the Fathers… ain’t that SPECIAL…
______________________________
Today, the entire “Establishment” is a clueless and hopeless blob of self-interested craven opportunism. Even the arty fringe… the people who pretend to be an avant-garde… are nothing but narcissistic self-branding operations masquerading as culture leaders. Of course, it’s cosmically ironic that the same generation of Boomer-hippies that ran in the streets and marched through the maze of service roads around the Pentagon has become a new “Establishment” more obtuse, feckless, greedy, and mendacious than the one they battled with over 40 years ago. I guess they just don’t see that their time has come to “get right” with reality… or get shoved aside and trampled.
James Kunstler
******
This is a bit more “free-form” and “stream-of-consciousness” than the usual post… just a warning…
In both politics and the Church, we face squalling children who want to pull down the structures of the ages in order to empower (and enrich) themselves. In politics, the extreme rightwing (Limbaugh, Koch brothers, Rand Paul, et al) embodies such juvenile truculence; in the Church, we find it amongst the formerly-Anglican and “Evangelical” konvertsy. Therefore, why should it surprise you that most konvertsy also trumpet rightwing shibboleths and promote rightwing fantasies such as the Manhattan Declaration? Despite all their screams of “conservatism”, these factions are “Radical” in the European sense… they’re against hierarchy, authority, and tradition (as their basis is in the bourgeoisie, they can’t be “conservative”… no mercantile-based ideology can be). Mind you, they scream much about all three. Yet, trust me… they’d not be accounted conservatives by the standards of Burke, TR, Bismarck, Stolypin, or Tsar Aleksandr Aleksandrovich. Furthermore, Ike, Dief, Rocky, Macdonald, and Abe Lincoln (who wanted to free the slaves, thusly interfering in a “capitalistic investment”) would’ve disowned them in a second.
We see this incarnated in the Legion of Christ and Opus Dei amongst the Catholics. They’re secretive, evasive, abusive, and protective of predators. That DOES sound familiar, doesn’t it? It sounds a lot like Paffhausen and his crew of scurvy apologists… do note that JP won’t “come clean” on his relationship with Podmoshensky (don’t forget, Freddie M-G and Dreher have direct and personal ties to Platina, too). Today, the entire “Establishment” is a clueless and hopeless blob of self-interested craven opportunism. Amen, amen, amen! Do note that the konvertsy support predatory clergy whilst screaming for the blood of homosexuals at the same time.
I don’t believe that the konvertsy left Anglicanism for the reasons that they give… friends in the TEC tell me that they’re simply rightwing disgrunts who lost a battle for control in their church, full stop. Why did we take such amongst us? Isn’t it obvious that any fish caught in troubled waters are likely to be toxic? Look at Reardon and Freeman… I rest my case. St Pavel Florensky (crossing myself and rolling my eyes at the same time)! That’s absolutely barmy and crackbrained. Even Mitrofanov won’t go as far, and he’s one of the Blunder’s aspirantura in Bolshaya Ordynka.
To show this in another light, a friend of mine wrote me:
Is [Love BT] crazy? He’s bloviating on the Monahakos Blog that there was no evidence of sexual abuse at Holy Trinity Cathedral in San Francisco after someone said he blew the investigation… is he mad or bad? The Sobor is turning into a political event… the OCA is imploding, and the converts are worried about gays. Buttons with Metropolitan Jonas on them? This is getting sick
One can only repeat, Today, the entire “Establishment” is a clueless and hopeless blob of self-interested craven opportunism. Don’t excuse it because BT’s “mentally disturbed”… he isn’t… he’s bad. We’ve all made mistakes… we’ve all done things that hurt others. However, it’s usually been in the context of family life, so, the damage has been limited. I’m NOT excusing it… certainly not in my own case, at least (I’ve been a rotter more than once, to be truthful… as have all of us). Yet, there IS a difference when a larger group is involved. “Quantity has a quality all its own”, as Stalin’s reputed to have quipped. More than one child was involved and the venue was a public church… that changes it from a private tragedy to an item of public interest (some “private tragedies” are also abuse, so, they’re against the law… the courts should deal with those). He wants to conceal his complicity in this… and his support of Nikolai Soraich, his former Chancellor (surely, he can’t claim that he was unaware of Soraich’s reputed tastes?). No one dare call it “self-interested craven opportunism”. Don’t drag in “mental illness” when “sin” will turn the trick well enough.
Keep the FACTS in mind. Eric Iliff brought suit… he “committed suicide”… Kristi Koumentakos brought suit… OCA clergy savaged her family and Lebedeff brutalised and savaged her on the OF along with Michael Reagan. Is Love BT going to protest this? NO… a thousand times, no.
These people are up to their usual old tricks. Do you want this to continue? Do think well upon that…
Barbara-Marie Drezhlo
Monday 3 October 2011
Albany NY
You must be logged in to post a comment.